Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2834-5029/056
Prevalence of Skin Sensitization Among Undergraduate Females at Buitems Caused by Exposure to Cosmetic Products
- Nida Tabassum Khan *
1*Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Life Sciences & Informatics, Balochistan University of Information Technology, Engineering and Management Sciences, Takatu Campus, Airport Road, Quetta, Balochistan
*Corresponding Author: v
Citation: Nida Tabassum Khan, (2024), Prevalence of Skin Sensitization Among Undergraduate Females at Buitems Caused by Exposure to Cosmetic Products, International Journal of Biomed Research, 3(4): DOI:10.31579/2834-5029/056
Copyright: © 2024, Nida Tabassum Khan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 09 July 2024 | Accepted: 18 July 2024 | Published: 25 July 2024
Keywords: sensitizer; contact dermatitis; allergens; cosmetics; undergraduates
Abstract
The health risks associated with the use of cosmetic products become currently an emerging public health problem especially among university undergraduates. In current studies prevalence of Skin sensitization among undergraduate female students at BUITEMS due to cosmetic usage was found to be relatively high i.e. 62% while 38% female undergraduates reported as non-sensitized skin (face). Clinical manifestation of adverse reactions on face skin (sensitized skin) caused by cosmetic use includes acne, redness, burns, itching/inflammation, dullness/discoloration, dehydration and allergies were the most commonly reported side effects in this study. The main reason for such adverse reactions includes sharing of cosmetics, careless behaviour towards cosmetic use safety regulations, over use of cosmetics on daily basis, multiple cosmetic products usages simultaneously without following proper guidelines, purchasing cheap or low-quality makeup/cosmetic products from nearby local shops etc. Besides Mothers’ education/occupation, fathers’ income, financial status etc were found to be statistically significant predictors for cosmetic use elevation potential risk of skin sensitization among female undergraduate students. Thus, the development of educational intervention to raise female awareness about harmful effects of the chemicals contained in cosmetics after prolonged use is important
Introduction
A significant, class of synthetics that possess the characteristic to prompt the condition of skin sensitivity in people are defined as sensitizers [1]. Toxicologically, these synthetic substances are depicted as skin sensitizers and for a really long time have been recognized by in vivo techniques in the guinea pig or the mouse [2]. When an individual has become sharpened, for example has created contact sensitivity, then given further and adequate openness they are definitely in danger of the outflow of the clinical illness we perceive as hypersensitive contact dermatitis (ACD) [3]. The greater part of people who are exposed to skin sensitizers neither foster distinguishable contact sensitivity nor do they express hypersensitive contact dermatitis [4]. The recurrence of positive diagnostic patch tests in dermatology has stayed raised, with 1 in each 7 patients positive in a new report [5]. Consequently, dermal sensitization sharpening to scents in these synthetics stays a huge issue [6]. Nonetheless, the material that follows connects with all compound skin sensitisers and not explicitly to scent substances [7]. The cycles related with the risk assessment of skin sensitizing synthetic substances have advanced impressively over the most recent twenty years. To a limited extent this has emerged in light of the enthusiasm for the enormous variety in the natural enlistment power of skin contact sensitizers [8].In 2008, a proposition was made for the dermal quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for scent associated synthetics to lay out industry rules, for risk evaluation and as a reason for risk the board of scent fixings in beauty care products [9].Recent studies revealed that most skin sensitization reactions were brought about by skincare items (36.6%), trailed by private tidiness items (29.5%), eye beauty care products (24.0%), antiperspirants (12.6%), and facial make-up items (8.3%) [10]. Most of the women could tackle the issue by halting the utilization of such items and buying an alternate brand. According to a report side effects of cosmetic‐induced sensory skin discomfort includes skin distress (consuming, stinging, tingling and so forth) happened all the more generally in the delicate skin accomplice (53%) than in the people who viewed themselves as non‐sensitive (17%) [11]. The European standard series, which is routinely used to test patients suspected of having allergic contact dermatitis, contains seven such allergens: p-phenylenediamine (dye), colophony (resin), parabens (preservative), wool alcohols (emollient, emulsifier), balsam of Peru (resin, indicator for fragrance sensitivity), formaldehyde (preservative), fragrance mix (cinnamic alcohol, cinnamic aldehyde, eugenol, hydroxycitronellal, amylcinnamaldehyde, geraniol, isoeugenol, oak moss absolute), and quaternium- 15 (preservative) [12,13,14]. Contact-incited dermatitis might be because of allergens incorporated in cosmetic products such as metals (nickel, gold), effective medicaments (effective corticosteroids), and beauty care products and individual consideration items (scents and additives like methyl-and methylchloro-isothiazolinone) [15]. Limitations of this research study includes firstly, estimations of negative events related to the cosmetics were based on participant self-report, which could be influenced by recall bias and thus cause underestimation. Secondly, social desirability image and unique university, limit generalization to other non-university women. The findings of this study may be useful to safety assessors in protecting the general public and those who are vulnerable. Thus, the aim of this research is to assess the prevalence of skin sensitization due to cosmetic use among undergraduate females at BUITEMS and also to identify its determinant and adverse effects on their face skin.
Materials and Methods
This study was a cross-sectional study, directed among the undergraduate female students studying in different departments at BUITEMS, Quetta, Pakistan. The students were selected at random studying in different departments. Informed verbal consent was obtained from these students keeping the sample size 100. The cross-sectional study design is best used when the researcher is interested to gather information at one point in time; it provides a snapshot of the population.
Inclusion criteria
- Adolescent undergraduate female students (aged between 18 and 25 “years”), who were ready to participate in the study
- Cosmetic user for a period of atleast an year
- Usage of atleast one cosmetic product on their face (lips, eyes, eyebrows included) on daily basis
- Self-reported occurrence of one or more cosmetic related adverse reaction in the past
Exclusion criteria
- Usage of cosmetic products on hand, feet, nails or hair were excluded
- Undergraduate female students with clinically diagnosed skin allergies/disease (face) due to any other reason rather than cosmetic use
Study was conducted with the help of a self-developed skin sensitization identification questionnaire designed to find the prevalence of skin sensitization due to cosmetic use and its associated contributing factors among undergraduates’ females. The questionnaire included items relating to the undergraduate’s frequency (number of times) of current daily cosmetic usage on their face (all the products they had used currently on a daily basis), type of cosmetic products used (make-up, sunblock, moisturizers etc), purpose of using cosmetics, place where they often buy their cosmetic products etc. In addition, information about cosmetics utilization cautions related practices such as label reading habit, reading special notes such as date of expiration and safety tips, content, and side effects, the user's instructions following etc, adverse effect/reaction after cosmetic application or after prolonged cosmetic product use in the past prior to data collection etc. Socio-demographic data of undergraduate female students e.g. family income, mother education/occupation were also obtained. By means of Microsoft excel 2013, statistical analysis of the data was done.
Results
Table 1 and Graph 1 depicts the frequency of cosmetic utilization among undergraduate females at BUITEMS.

Table 1: Frequency of cosmetic use among undergraduate females
Graph 1: Frequency of cosmetic use among undergraduate females
Table 2 and Graph 2 depicts the purpose of cosmetic use on face among undergraduate females at BUITEMS

Table 2: Purpose of cosmetic use among undergraduate females
Graph 2: Purpose of cosmetic use among undergraduate females
Types of cosmetics used on daily basis and their branding by the undergraduate females at BUITEMS were given in Table 3 and Graph 3.

Table 3: Types of cosmetics used on daily basis and their branding by the undergraduate females
Graph 3: Types of cosmetics used on daily basis and their branding by the undergraduate females
Source of shopping and cosmetics cautions related practices among the undergraduate females were given in Table 4 and Graph 4.

Table 4: Source of shopping and cosmetics cautions related practices among the undergraduates
Graph 4: Source of shopping and cosmetics cautions related practices among the undergraduates
Self-reported adverse effect/reaction after cosmetic application or after prolonged cosmetic product use in the past among undergraduate females at BUITEMS is given in Table 5/Graph 5

Table 5: Self-reported cosmetic related adverse effect on face skin
Graph 5: Self-reported cosmetic related adverse effect on face skin
Socio-demographic data of undergraduate female students e.g. family income, mother education/occupation etc were given in Table 6 and Graph 6.
S.no | Socio-demographic data | No of undergraduates (%) (n=100) |
1 | Family income |
|
Sufficient | 62 | |
Insufficient | 21 | |
Enough/save | 17 | |
2 | Mothers’ education | |
Educated | 78 | |
Uneducated | 22 | |
3 | Mothers’ occupation | |
Housewife | 69 | |
Working | 31 |
Table 6: Socio-demographic data of undergraduate female students
Graph 6: Socio-demographic data of undergraduate female students
Prevalence of Skin (face) sensitization among undergraduate female students at BUITEMS were given in Table 7 and Graph 7.

Table 7: Prevalence of Skin sensitization among undergraduate female students
Graph 7: Prevalence of Skin sensitization among undergraduate female students
Discussion
In this work, we evaluated the prevalence of Skin sensitization among undergraduate female students at BUITEMS due to cosmetic usage which accounted for 62% i.e., high while 38?male undergraduates reported as non-sensitized skin (face) as depicted in Table/Graph 7. A high percentage of undergraduate female students uses cosmetics products on daily basis for beautification, cleaning, or other purposes. As depicted in Table/Graph 1 the frequency of cosmetic utilization among undergraduate females is quite high i.e., 79% reported to use cosmetic products three times a day while 8% undergraduate females’ cosmetic usage frequency was more than three times and there was not even a single individual who have reported to be a non-user of cosmetic products. This high percentage indicates that due to their young age, students are more concerned about their appearance and beauty especially in a co-education setting, which might increase the demand for cosmetics use [16]. As depicted Table/Graph 2 a high percentage of university females uses cosmetic based products for the purpose of beautification and cleansing i.e. 88% and 100% respectively.Widespread usage of cosmetic products may be attributed to advances in the cosmetic industry and scalable cosmetic companies advertising cosmetics and personal care products [17]. In addition, beauty may be a common goal for university female students who use cosmetics which might be attributed to their adulthood age and a higher percentage of unmarried status as well [18].Over recent years, the global cosmetic market is increasing at alarming rate, driven by demands from consumers who are increasingly concerned about their appearance. Naturally, from the perspective of the need that could be either physiological or sociological, females tend to place more interest in maintaining their self-images, and due to this fact, cosmetics appeared to be linked with females [19]. Thus, the main claimed purpose of cosmetics use by female students were beautification and entertainment.Cosmetic sources have shown a significant association with the incidence of adverse reactions on face skin. In this study, the proportion of female undergraduate students who obtained their cosmetics from local shops sources was very high i.e. 74% while only 26% reported to use imported cosmetics as depicted in Table/Graph 3 and majority of those females buy cosmetic products from nearby
local shops i.e.86% than from drug retail outlets, such as pharmacy as indicated by our obtained results in Table/Graph 4. Furthermore, cosmetic usage habits have been reported in several studies as a significant predictor of the occurrence of negative events. As our obtained results in Table/Graph 4 indicated that 59% of female undergraduates were careless regarding cosmetic usage safety regulations and tend to not read the cautions before using a cosmetic product thus ignoring the probable health risks. Because of improper habits regarding safety advice that they should follow while using cosmetics near to 1/5th of female cosmetic users develop at least one adverse event due to cosmetic product usage in the university [20]. In addition, use of many types /numbers of cosmetic products since they can afford to purchase, females’ undergraduate students who had a number of varieties of cosmetic products at hand could over use [21]. Using multiple cosmetics at a time, might increase synergistic action of cosmetic products or increase the concentration of ingredients above the limit which might lead to adverse events [22]. Mothers’ education/occupation, fathers’ income, financial status etc were found to be statistically significant predictors for cosmetic use as indicated in Table/Graph 6. Thus, these factors pose increased risk of skin sensitization among female undergraduates at BUITEMS.A number of studies identified evidences for the association between the rate of continuous use of cosmetic products with female especially in the younger age group, who are highly educated and have better economic status [23]. Exposure to various chemical compounds contained in cosmetics presents health risks ranging from a mild hypersensitivity response to fatal poisoning [24]. Clinical manifestation of adverse reactions on face skin caused by cosmetics includes acne (59%), redness (67%), burns (61%), itching/inflammation (73%), dullness/discoloration (84%), dehydration (87%) and allergies (62%) were the most commonly reported side effects in this study due to cosmetic usage among undergraduates as depicted in Table/Graph 5. The possible explanation for such adverse events is majority of students use cosmetics with friends and family members. Sharing has been shown to expose cosmetics to microbic pollution, which can contribute to acne and other infections [25]. Additionally, addition of water or saliva to some of their cosmetics was also identified as an undesirable habit. Water and saliva are ideal medium for bacterial development since they reduce the quantities of preservatives in some way [26]. This could be one of the probable reasons for the unpleasant adverse events reported by the students. Therefore, in the light of this research, the development of educational intervention to raise female awareness about harmful effects of the chemicals contained in cosmetics after prolonged use is important. In terms of cosmetic exposures and its associated health outcomes, could provide valuable information for public health in the area of risk assessment and future service regulation [27]. Moreover, such information will help to attract the attention of consumers who are more susceptible to the dangerous effects of chemicals contained in cosmetic products [28]. On top of that, cosmetics consumers are highly recommended to follow some safety tips. This includes reading expiration dates and ingredients on the labels, not sharing cosmetic products, consuming products hygienically and with fewer ingredients, and shopping from the right sources [29]. Nevertheless, selling products without the authorities’ approval, lack of population awareness about proper use of cosmetics and lack of proper adverse effect reporting systems are still prevailing factors particularly in developing countries [30].
Conclusion
In this study, a recent information is provided on the pattern of using large number of cosmetics that are widely consumed by female students in at BUITEMS. Such data is critical for determining exposure and risk. The overall prevalence of cosmetic use was significantly high. It was discovered that the utilization of cosmetics varies substantially, and different products are consumed at the same time. Reporting adverse effects of cosmetic products requires observance of safety concerns related to cosmetic use. Furthermore, the majority of students had unacceptable habits regarding the safety precautions that they should follow during use.
References
- A C de Groot.1990. Labelling cosmetics with their ingredients.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - A. C. de GROOT, J. P. NATER, R. van der LENDER, B. RIJCKEN. 1987. Adverse effects of cosmetics and toiletries: a retrospective study in the general population
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Anton C. de Groot, Enny G. A. Beverdam, Christien Tjong Ayong, Pieter J. Coenraads. (1988). The role of contact allergy in the spectrum of adverse effects caused by cosmetics and toiletries.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Anton C. de Groot.(1987). Contact allergy to cosmetics: causative ingredients
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Azhar Danish Khan, Mohammad Niyaz Alam. (2019). COSMETICS AND THEIR ASSOCIATED ADVERSE EFFECTS: A REVIEW
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - B. de Unamuno, V. Zaragoza Ninet, C. Sierra, J. de la Cuadra. (2014). Descriptive Study of Sensitization to Methylchloroisothiazolinone and Methylisothiazolinone in a Skin Allergy UnitEstudio descriptivo de la sensibilización a metilcloroisotiazolinona/metilisotiazolinona en una unidad de alergia cutánea
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - C.M. Willis, S. Shaw, O. De Lacharrière, M. Baverel, L. Reiche, R. Jourdain, P. Bastien, J.D. Wilkinson. (2001). Sensitive skin: An Epidemiological study
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Erik Skog. (1980). Incidence of cosmetic dermatitis
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - J.P. Thyssen, A. Linneberg, T. Menné, N.H. Nielsen, J.D. Johansen. (2009). The prevalence and morbidity of sensitization to fragrance mix I in the general population
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Luz Fonacier MD, Irum Noor DO. (2018). Contact dermatitis and patch testing for the allergies.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - M.D. Lundov, T. Krongaard, T.L. Menné, J.D. Johansen. (2011). Methylisothiazolinone contact allergy: a review
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Manjula Nayak 1, Dharmagadda Sreedhar 1, Smitha S. Prabhu 2 and Virendra S. Ligade.2021. Global Trends in Cosmetics Use-Related Adverse Effects: A Bibliometric Analysis of Literature Published during 1957–2021
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - MaríaAntonia Pastor-Nieto a b, Francisco Alcántara-Nicolás a, Virginia Melgar-Molero a, Raquel Pérez-Mesonero a, Aránzazu Vergara-Sánchez a, Adriana Martín-Fuentes a, Patricia González-Muñoz a, Esther de Eusebio-Murillo.2017. Preservatives in Personal Hygiene and Cosmetic Products, Topical Medications, and Household Cleaners in SpainConservantes en productos de higiene y cosméticos, medicamentos tópicos y productos de limpieza doméstica en España
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - MichaelK. Robinson1, G. FrankGerberick1, Cindy A. Ryan1, PaulineMcNamee2, Ian. White3andDavidA. Baskette. 2000. The importance of exposure estimation in the assessment of skin sensitization risk. 0105-1873.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Peter Griem, Carsten Goebel, Heike Scheffler. December 2003. Proposal for a risk assessment methodology for skin sensitization based on sensitization potency data. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Peytchinski, Gospodin Iliev.2012. ALLERGIC CONTACT DERMATITIS FROM FORMALDEHYDE EXPOSURE
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - PK Nigam.2009. Adverse reactions to cosmetics and methods of testing
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Pramod Kumar.2014. Patch Testing in Suspected Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Cosmetics
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - R Shrestha1, J Shakya1 *.2016. KNOWLEDGE REGARDING ADVERSE EFFECTS OF SELECTED COSMETIC PRODUCTS AMONG HIGHER SECONDARY LEVEL GIRL STUDENTS, CHITWAN
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Waranya Boonchai, Rasthawathana Desomchoke.(2011). Trend of contact allergy to cosmetic ingredients in Thais over a period of 10 years
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Martins, M. S., Ferreira, M. S., Almeida, I. F., & Sousa, E. (2022). Occurrence of allergens in cosmetics for sensitive skin. Cosmetics, 9(2), 32.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Willis, C. M., Shaw, S., De Lacharriere, O., Baverel, M., Reiche, L., Jourdain, R., ... & Wilkinson, J. D. (2001). Sensitive skin: an epidemiological study. British Journal of Dermatology, 145(2), 258-263.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Drechsel, D. A., Towle, K. M., Fung, E. S., Novick, R. M., Paustenbach, D. J., & Monnot, A. D. (2018). Skin sensitization induction potential from daily exposure to fragrances in personal care products. Dermatitis, 29(6), 324-331.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Robinson, M. K., Gerberick, G. F., Ryan, C. A., McNamee, P., White, I. R., & Basketter, D. A. (2000). The importance of exposure estimation in the assessment of skin sensitization risk. Contact Dermatitis, 42(5), 251-259.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Daniel, A. B., Strickland, J., Allen, D., Casati, S., Zuang, V., Barroso, J., ... & Kleinstreuer, N. (2018). International regulatory requirements for skin sensitization testing. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 95, 52-65.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Hoffmann, S., Alépée, N., Gilmour, N., Kern, P. S., van Vliet, E., Boislève, F., ... & Api, A. M. (2022). Expansion of the Cosmetics Europe skin sensitisation database with new substances and PPRA data. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 131, 105169.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Orton, D. I., & Wilkinson, J. D. (2004). Cosmetic allergy: incidence, diagnosis, and management. American journal of clinical dermatology, 5, 327-337.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Roberts, D. W., & Aptula, A. O. (2008). Determinants of skin sensitisation potential. Journal of Applied Toxicology: An International Journal, 28(3), 377-387.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - González-Muñoz, P., Conde-Salazar, L., & Vañó-Galván, S. (2014). Allergic contact dermatitis caused by cosmetic products. Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas (English Edition), 105(9), 822-832.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Engasser, P., Long, T., McNamee, P., Schlatter, H., & Gray, J. (2007). Safety of cosmetic products. Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 6, 23-31.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar