Advertisement

Mick: a Database of Gut Microbial Genes Linked with Chemoresistance in Cancer Patients

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2834-8427/033

Mick: a Database of Gut Microbial Genes Linked with Chemoresistance in Cancer Patients

  • Muhammad Shahzaib 1
  • Haseeb Manzoor 1
  • Hasnain Zubair 1
  • Farzana Jabeen 2
  • Masood Ur Rehman Kayani 1*

1Department of Sciences, School of Interdisciplinary Engineering & Sciences (SINES), National University of Sciences & Technology (NUST), Srinagar Highway, Sector H-12, Islamabad, Pakistan.

2Department of Computing, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (SEECS) National University of Sciences & Technology (NUST), Srinagar Highway, Sector H-12, Islamabad, Pakistan. 

*Corresponding Author: Masood Ur Rehman Kayani, 1Department of Sciences, School of Interdisciplinary Engineering & Sciences (SINES), National University of Sciences & Technology (NUST), Srinagar Highway, Sector H-12, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Citation: Muhammad Shahzaib, Haseeb Manzoor, Hasnain Zubair, Farzana Jabeen, M. Ur Rehman Kayani, (2024), MiCK: a database of gut microbial genes linked with chemoresistance in cancer patients, J Clinical Gynaecology and Breast, 3(5); DOI: 10.31579/2834-8427/033

Copyright: © 2024, Masood Ur Rehman Kayani. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 04 October 2024 | Accepted: 21 October 2024 | Published: 29 October 2024

Keywords: cancer; chemoresistance; gut microbiome; chemotherapy; database; metagenomics

Abstract

Cancer remains a global health challenge, with significant morbidity and mortality rates. In 2020, cancer caused nearly 10 million deaths, making it the second leading cause of death worldwide. However, the emergence of chemoresistance becomes a major hurdle in successfully treating patients. Human gut microbes have been recognized for their role in modulating drug efficacy through their metabolites, ultimately leading to chemoresistance. The available databases are currently limited to knowledge regarding the interactions between gut microbiome and drugs. However, a database containing the human gut microbial gene sequences, and their effect on the efficacy of chemotherapy for cancer patients has not yet been reported. To address this challenge, we present the Microbial Chemoresistance Knowledgebase (MiCK), a comprehensive database cataloging microbial gene sequences associated with chemoresistance cancers. MiCK contains 1.6 million sequences of 29 gene types linked to chemoresistance and drug metabolism, curated manually from recent literature and sequence databases. The database supports efficient data retrieval and analysis, providing a user-friendly web interface for sequence search and download functionalities. MiCK aims to facilitate the understanding and mitigation of chemoresistance in cancers by serving as a valuable resource for researchers.

Introduction

Cancer is a significant global health concern, ranking among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. According to the WHO, cancer accounted for nearly 10 million deaths in 2020, making it the second leading cause of death globally. The GLOBOCAN report highlights that there were approximately 19.3 million new cancer cases and 10 million cancer-related deaths in 2020 [1]. Factors contributing to the incidence of cancer include genetic predisposition, lifestyle factors such as diet, obesity, and alcohol consumption, as well as environmental exposures and infections. Multiple treatment strategies are available for cancer, ranging from surgical interventions to chemotherapy, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapies. The approach to treatment often depends on the type and stage of cancer, as well as the patient's overall health and preferences [2]. Major drugs used to treat cancer include 5-Flurouracil (5-FU), Capecitabine, Gemcitabine, Irinotecan, and Oxaliplatin. 5-FU is a commonly used antimetabolite drug for cancer that causes the inhibition of thymidylate synthase, an enzyme essential for DNA synthesis and repair. Capecitabine, a prodrug of 5-FU, is converted to 5-FU in tumor tissue by the enzyme thymidine phosphorylase [3]. Furthermore, it has replaced 5-FU due to its improved pharmacokinetics and tolerability [4]. Gemcitabine is a nucleoside analog that inhibits DNA synthesis by interfering with the activity of the ribonucleotide reductase enzyme [5]. Irinotecan, a DNA topoisomerase inhibitor, binds to topoisomerase which causes the inhibition of DNA replication and transcription through its active metabolite i.e., SN38 [3]. Oxaliplatin works by forming DNA adducts inhibiting DNA replication, transcription, DNA damage, and apoptosis of cancer cells [3]. Chemoresistance is a major challenge in the successful treatment of cancer patients. The human gut microbiome has recently been attributed to the emergence of chemoresistance in cancer patients [7]. Gut microbial species including E. coli, B. longum, Citrobacter, and E. faecalis metabolize 5-FU, the most common drug used in treating cancer patients, and alter its efficacy [11]. Another prominent example includes the increased efflux of oxaliplatin by gut microbes through the glucuronidation mechanism by the β-glucuronidase enzyme. This enzyme inactivates SN38 (an activated form of irinotecan) by converting it to SN38G [10].F. nucleatum, another common gut microbial species, promotes chemoresistance by the modulation of autophagy [8]. Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium have been found to have higher abundance in the progressive disease group compared to the partial response group in cases administered with folinic acid, 5-FU, and irinotecan [6]. Several databases have been designed, considering the importance of the gut microbiome and its interaction with drugs used in chemotherapy. These include Pharmaco Microbiomic which contains 131 records about the effect of drugs on gut microbiome [7]. 

Microbe-Drug Association

Database (MDAD) contains interactions of 1388 drugs and 180 microbes curated from drug databases and relevant literature [8]. MagMD is also a comprehensive database for metabolic actions of the gut microbiome on drugs, covering 32,678 interactions between 2,146 microbes, 36 enzymes, and 219 substrates [9]. To the best of our knowledge, no database currently exists that provides dedicated access to microbial gene sequences potentially involved in chemoresistance in cancer patients. To address this challenge, we present the Microbial Chemoresistance Knowledgebase (MiCK), a comprehensive database cataloging microbial gene sequences associated with chemoresistance in CRC. MiCK contains 1.6 million sequences of 29 gene types linked to chemoresistance and drug metabolism, curated from recent literature and databases. The database architecture, built using MySQL, supports efficient data retrieval and analysis, offering a user-friendly web interface for search and download functionalities. MiCK is designed to facilitate the understanding and mitigation of chemoresistance in cancer treatment, serving as an invaluable resource for researchers.

Materials and Methods

Identification of gut microbial chemoresistance genes for the identification of gut microbial genes, potentially associated with chemoresistance, we first performed a literature search in PubMed [10] and Google Scholar [11] using the following keywords: “chemoresistance”, “cancer”, and “gut microbiome”. Through manual curation, the search results were restricted to only the publications that reported or discussed microbial genes or products that could potentially result in chemoresistance. In addition, enzymes involved in the metabolism of commonly used therapeutics for cancer were searched in the KEGG [12] and MagMD databases [9]. After collecting information on genes and enzymes we retrieved their sequences from the UniProtKB, and NCBI Gene databases [13]. Through this, we identified 29 gene types that could potentially confer chemoresistance. These gene types include Butyrate, short-chain fatty acid produced by gut microbes [14]; cytidine deaminase, produced by Gamma proteobacteria that inactivates Gemcitabine [15]; cysteine desulfurase (NFS1) weaken the sensitivity of cancer cells to oxaliplatin [16]; Dihydropyridine dehydrogenase (DHP), which causes catabolism of 5-FU  [17]; Dutpase, whose expression is linked to susceptibility of cancer cells to chemotherapeutics like 5-FU [18]; Glutathione (GLU) [19]; Glutathione S-transferase (GST), a detoxification enzyme for oxaliplatin [20]; UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) [21]; Histone deacetylase6  (HDAC6) [22]; NME2 (nucleoside diphosphate kinase 2) plays a role in chemoresistance to 5-FU, knockdown of NME2 gene increases sensitivity to 5-FU in CRC cell lines [23]; Ribonucleotide reductase consists of two subunits M1 and M2. M1 subunit is present in large amounts in microarray profiles of in vivo resistance to gemcitabine model which depicts its role in chemoresistance [24]; Thymidine kinases (TK) are involved in the salvage pathway capable of synthesizing deoxythymidine by phosphorylation of thymidine thus helping in DNA synthesis; TK2 involved in chemoresistance thus knocking them by small interfering RNA sensitizes the cell to gemcitabine chemotherapy [25]; 5-FU inhibits the thymidylate synthase (TS) stopping DNA replication and apoptosis of tumor cells. One of the key indicators of chemoresistance to 5- FU is an increase in the concentration of TS in tumor cells [19]; UMP/CMP kinase is an enzyme involve in the phosphorylation in 5-FU mechanism, but miR-130-b which is a key epigenetic regulator of UMP/CMP kinase attenuates the functioning and leads to chemoresistance of 5-FU [26]; β-glucuronidase (BGU) is an enzyme produced by mostly by four gut bacterial phyla i.e., Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Verrucomicrobia, and Proteobacteria. BGU induces toxicity in response to irinotecan thus limiting the dose and affecting the efficacy of irinotecan [27]; Most of the chemotherapeutics are topoisomerase active substances but the topoisomerase inhibitors (DTI) are involved in the chemoresistance against these drugs. DTI includes ATP-binding cassette transporters (ABC), GSH, and HDA6 [28]; Deoxycytidine kinase (dck) is involved in the phosphorylation and the studies reported the role of dck in limiting the cytotoxic activity of gemcitabine [29]; Hydroxyglutarate has been shown to inhibit α-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases, including histone demethylases. This leads to epigenetic changes that can promote tumor progression and chemotherapeutic resistance [30]; Metallothionein (MT) are small cystine-enriched molecules with 4 isoforms, MT1 to MT4. Thiol groups of MT are involved in chemoresistance to oxaliplatin, a drug used for the treatment of CRC through the mechanism of drug detoxification which prevents cells from apoptosis and accumulation of oxaliplatin [31]; Toll-like receptors (TLR) are the main receptor pathway that can mitigate the bacterial process of production of pro-inflammatory cytokines that help in tumorigenesis and can lead to [32] chemoresistance in cancer cells. An active TLR-4-MyD88 signaling pathway could pose a risk for cancer development and serve as a promising target for creating biomodulators to combat chemoresistance [33]; Thymidine phosphorylase is involved in the activation of 5-FU, but it is also involved in tumor progression through angiogenesis and by avoiding apoptosis which depicts its role in chemoresistance against 5-FU based chemotherapy of cancer [34]. The gut microbiome can influence the functionality of drugs by secreting several enzymes [32]. Therefore, to enhance the pool of genes that can potentially result in chemoresistance, we searched for pathways of drug metabolism in the KEGG Pathway Database [12] and explored the MagMD database that provided the information about interaction of microbial enzymes and drugs [9]. We then retrieved the sequences of all the enzymes from UniProtKB and NCBI gene databases. β-ureidopropionase, phosphoribosyl transferase, uridine phosphorylase, uracil phosphoribosyl transferase, carboxyl esterase, uridine kinase, and deoxycytidine kinase were the enzymes involved in the metabolism of cancer drugs and were used in our database. The list of chemoresistance genes (CRGs) is provided in Table 1.

CRGs

Drug

Effect

Reference

Butyrate

Oxaliplatin

Chemoresistance

[14]

Cytidine deaminase

Gemcitabine

Chemoresistance

[15]

Cystine desulfurase

Oxaliplatin

Decreasedsensitivty/Chemoresistance

[16]

Dihydro pyridin dehydrogenase

Capecitabine/ 5-FU

Catabolism

[17]

Glutathione

Oxaliplatin

Chemoresistance

[36]

Glutathione s transferase

Oxaliplatin

Detoxificationenzyme

[20]

UDP glucuronosyltransferases

Irinotecan

Chemoresistance

[21]

Nucleoside diphosphate kinase

Capecitabine

Chemoresistance

[23]

Ribonucleotide reductase

Gemcitabine

Chemoresistance

[24]

Thymidine kinases

Gemcitabine

Chemoresistance

[25]

Thymidylate synthase

5-FU

Drug target

[19]

UMP/CMP kinase

Capecitabine

Chemoresistance

[37]

β-glucuronidase

Irinotecan

Reduced efficacy

[27]

ATP-binding cassette transporters

Oxaliplatin

Efflux of drugs

[28]

Metallothionein

Oxaliplatin

Chemoresistance

[31]

Hydroxyglutarate

Gemcitabine

Chemoresistance

[30]

DNA topoisomerase inhibitors

Irinotecan

Chemoresistance

[28]

Carboxyl esterase

Capecitabine

Substrate metabolism

[9]

dUTPase

Capecitabine

Chemoresistance

[38]

Histone deacetylase

Gemcitabine

Chemoresistance

[22]

Purine nucleoside

5-FU

Chemoresistance

[23]

phosphorylase

 

 

 

Thymidine phosphorylase

Capecitabine

Chemoresistance

[34]

Toll like receptors

5-FU

Chemoresistance

[33]

β-ureidopropionase

Capecitabine

Substrate metabolism

[9]

Phosphoribosyl transferase

5-FU

Substrate metabolism

[9]

Uridine phosphorylase

Capecitabine

Substrate metabolism

[9]

Uracil phosphoribosyl transferase

Capecitabine

Substrate metabolism

[9]

Uridine kinase

5-FU

Substrate metabolism

[9]

Deoxycytidine kinase

Gemcitabine

Substrate metabolism

[9]

Table 1: Chemoresistance genes, associated drugs, and their effects.

Non-redundant CRG catalogue and database construction

MMseqs2 (version 13.45111) was used to cluster the CRGs [35]. MMseqs2 used a clustering algorithm to construct the indexed database from the concatenated sequences file and then performed clustering using linclust. Clustering was performed using multiple identity thresholds (i.e., 50%, 75%, 80%, 90%, and 100%) with query coverage of 80%. The database was created using MySQL (version 8.0.2, https://www.mysql.com/) consists of 5 columns: “Accession_number”, “Gene_type”, “Drug”, “Uniport_Accession”, and “Effects”. The accession number serves as the primary key of the database, the second column contains gene type information, the third column provides the target drug for the gene type, the fourth column holds the full gene type names, the fifth column contains the original accession numbers for retrieving sequences from UniProtKB, and the last column holds the information of effects on the drugs. The framework of the database construction is illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Framework for developing MiCK.

Graphical user interface design

The MiCK platform is developed using the MERN stack, which includes MongoDB, Express, React, and Node.js. MongoDB was utilized as the database. Express.js served as the backend framework to communicate between the frontend and database. React.js was employed for building the user interface, offering a responsive and interactive environment for researchers to input, view, and analyze data.

MiCK Statistics

MiCK hosts ~1.6 million sequences that encompass 29 CRGs following a thorough literature search and an extensive review of drug-metabolizing enzymes. Among these GLU is the most frequent gene type included in MiCK with ~0.6 million representative gene sequences, followed by PRT (~0.25 million gene sequences) (Figure 2A). MiCK contains ~0.6 million genes that target oxaliplatin, followed by gemcitabine for which ~0.4 million target gene sequences are present in MiCK (Figure 2B). The effects column comprises chemoresistance, chemosensitivity, and substrate metabolism. Chemoresistance is the most frequent effect with almost 1.3 million repetitions.

Figure 1: Framework for developing MiCK.

Database web interface:

MiCK offers a user-friendly interface with 4 navigation bars, i.e., Home, Search, Download, and About.

1. Home

The home page serves as an introductory page comprising of general information about the database. It serves as an informative desk for other pages, i.e., how to navigate, search and download through MiCK. The home page also presents users with the key statistics with visualization of pie charts.

Figure 2: Key statistics of MiCK. (A) Distribution of chemoresistance genes in the MiCK. (B) Distribution of Drug Targets in the MiCK database

2. Search

The search page comprises a selection box, where you select the search criteria; search box, that allows keyword input; and a search button to initiate the search process. The search page allows a keyword search across the database. Users can search through accession number, drug name, gene name, effect, or bacteria name. The resultant table displays the information of gene type, its drug target, potential effect on the drug, and the associated bacterial host.

Figure 3: The graphical user interface of MiCK. (A) The Home page of MiCK. (B) The key statistics of MiCK. (C) The Search page of MiCK. The user can search gut microbial genes and their effect on drugs. (D) The Download page provides a utility to download datasets used in MiCK.

3. Download

The download page offers the utility to download the CRG catalog which includes the sequencing files as well as the metadata. Currently, users can download the CRG catalog clustered at 50%, 75%, 80%, 90%, and 100% similarity cutoffs. Metadata includes information about the CRGs, corresponding drugs, effects on the drug. The graphical user interface of MiCK is shown in Figure 3.

 

 

4. About

The About page provides help for the users by answering some of the most frequently asked questions (FAQs) that a potential user can have in mind. In addition, the contact information of the database administrator is also provided for further queries.

List of abbreviations

Abbreviation               Full form

UniProtKB Universal Protein Knowledgebase

5-FU           5-Fluorouracil

CRC           Colorectal cancer

GLOBOCAN             Global Cancer Observatory

KEGG        Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

MDR          Multidrug resistance

RT-PCR     Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

SCFA         Short-chain fatty acids

CRG           Chemoresistance genes

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Funding

This research was funded by the Graduate Research Support Fund to SM (402305) by the National University of Sciences & Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan.

Author’s contributions

MS performed the literature search, curation, and sequence retrieval. HM, and HZ performed the database construction. FJ developed the GUI for the database. MRK conceived the idea, supervised the research, and provided resources for the project. All authors contributed to manuscript preparation and have read and agreed to the submission of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors are highly thankful to Umme Habiba, M. Faheem Raziq, M. Adnan Tariq, and members of the Microbiome Research Group at the SINES, NUST, Islamabad, Pakistan, for useful discussion and feedback on our manuscript.

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan