Advertisement

Pneumopericardium a Rare Complication of Pericardiocentesis

Case report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2834-796X/065

Pneumopericardium a Rare Complication of Pericardiocentesis

  • Amit Mandal

Department of Cardiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

*Corresponding Author: Amit Mandal, Department of Cardiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Citation: Amit Mandal (2024), Pneumopericardium a Rare Complication of Pericardiocentesis, International Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine, 3(3); DOI:10.31579/2834-796X/065

Copyright: © 2024, Amit Mandal. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 23 May 2024 | Accepted: 11 June 2024 | Published: 17 June 2024

Keywords: pneumopericardium; pericardiocentesis; echocardiography

Abstract

Pneumopericardium is a rare complication of pericardiocentesis and defined as the presence of air in the pericardial space. Pneumopericardium usually occurs after trauma. However, pneumopericardium due to iatrogenic procedures, such as pericardiocentesis, is very rare. Immediate recognition and treatment are crucial and chest X-ray, thorax computerized tomography and transthoracic echocardiography helps in making a diagnosis. Herein, we report the case of a 48-year-old female with cardiac tamponade who developed pneumopericardium after pericardiocentesis.

Introduction

Pneumopericardium is a rare condition in which there is air in the pericardial space. It usually occurs after trauma. However, iatrogenic pneumopericardium during pericardiocentesis is rare. Imaging methods are the mainstay in making the diagnosis of pneumopericardium. Posteroanterior chest radiography reveals the typical finding of radiolucent rim separating the pericardium from the heart. Echocardiography can demonstrate mobile air bubbles around the pericardium. Chest tomography is the gold standard for definitive diagnosis. Herein, we report the case of a 48-year-old female with cardiac tamponade who developed pneumopericardium after pericardiocentesis.

Case Presentation

A 46-year-old lady was admitted with worsening of breathing difficulty for two weeks. She had a history of pulmonary tuberculosis four years back and has taken six months of anti-tubercular medication. Physical examination revealed stable vital signs.

Posteroanterior chest radiograph showed cardiomegaly without any lung lesion. (Figure 1) An emergent ECHO cardiogram showed moderate Pericardial effusion (posteriorly 17mm, anteriorly 4mm, laterally 6mm) There was no RA/RV diastolic collapse seen. (Figure 2)

Figure 1: chest radiograph showing cardiomegaly without any lung lesion.

Figure 2: Transthoracic echo showing pericardial effusion. (white arrow)

He was taken up for pericardiocentesis under Local Anaesthesia. After instillation of 2% xylocaine in the subxiphoid area, the micropuncture needle was used to enter pericardial cavity, and with the use of guidewire, 6F sheath and 6F Pigtail catheter was inserted and 800 ml straw coloured pericardial fluid was drained and was sent for analysis. Echo showed no pericardial fluid and procedure was stopped. Sheath and pigtail were removed. Subsequently, the patient's resting dyspnea was resolved. Sputum and pericardial fluid cultures and smear for AFB and other organisms were negative. The pericardial fluid was a lymphocyte dominant exudate, containing protein 6.4 g/dL, albumin 3.5 g/dL, lactate dehydrogenase 194 U/L and white blood cell 200 cells/µL (lymphocyte 94%). Polymerase chain reaction for Mycobacterium tuberculosis deoxyribonucleic acid was negative. 

Next day the patient developed a pleuritic chest pain with respiratory distress with hypotension. Follow up chest radiograph showed a lucency around the cardiac silhouette with 'continuous diaphragm sign', limited superiorly by the cardiac pedicle, which was not seen in previous radiograph with reduction in cardiac size. (Figure 3). Emergency CT Thorax revealed pneumopericardium. (Fig 4) In view of pneumopericardium with hemodynamic compromise she was taken up for pericardiocentesis again and final flouro showed minimal residual air in the pericardial cavity. Recheck echo showed normal biventricular function and no features of cardiac tamponade. Subjective symptoms and radiological signs of pneumopericardium disappeared five days later. (Fig 5) The patient’s clinical syndrome was treated with steroids and antitubercular therapy.

Figure 3: Chest radiograph showing a lucency around the cardiac silhouette with ‘continuous diaphragm sign' (white arrow)

Figure 4a & 4b: CT Thorax revealed pneumopericardium (white arrow)

Figure 5a: (Chest radiograph) 5b (Transthoracic echo) showing no signs of pneumopericardium.

Discussion

Pneumopericardium is defined as an accumulation of air-fluid level in the pericardial cavity. It is a rare but can be life-threatening entity. There are multiple causes  for development of pneumopericardium   such as penetrating or blunt chest trauma, pericardium infections  with gas forming organisms, iatrogenic and invasive procedures, abnormal communications such as fistula between the pericardium and hallow organs, or even spontaneously without any underlying cause in healthy adult.[1–3] Iatrogenic pneumopericardium occurring after therapeutic pericardiocentesis is very rare.[4] During pericardiocentesis, pneumopericardium can be caused by direct pleuropericardial connection or reverse air leakage from the catheter.[5]

Clinical manifestations are variable and very unspecific like pain, dyspnea, palpitation. Sometimes patients could be asymptomatic making early detection of the disease before hemodynamic instability  a real challenge.[6]   Tension pneumopericardium can be fatal. Physical examination may show tachycardia, distended neck veins, and hypotension. Pathognomonic signs such as the mill wheel murmur “bruit de moulin” can be heard as a succession splash and traducing shaking movement of the heart within pericardial cavity on cardiac auscultation.[6] Chest radiographs reveal air as a radiolucent rim separating the pericardium from the heart, called “Continuous diaphragm sign.[7]

TTE findings can show two pathognomic signs: “The air gap sign” traducing a cyclic disappearance of the cardiac shape during systole coinciding with a cycling appearance of air within the pericardium during this phase as the volume of cardiac cavities decreases [8,9]and “The swirling bubbles sign” representing the presence of an air-fluid interface with continuous churning movements in pericardial cavity due to heart activity and which is revealed in echocardiography by several tiny bright echogenic spots in the pericardial sac evoking micro air bubbles[7,10] Chest CT can   confirm the diagnosis and is the mainstay of diagnosis of pneumopericardium in obscure cases. It offers further information concerning mechanisms and associate lesions.

 Usually, pneumopericardium resolves spontaneously. [2,11] In the presence of acute hemodynamic instability suggesting cardiac tamponade, an emergent pericardiocentesis with hemodynamic monitoring are required to promptly restore hemodynamic stability, followed by pericardial fenestration and drainage[12]

In the case of iatrogenic pneumopericardium following pericardiocentesis for pericardial effusion, a re-pericardiocentesis is indicated if hemodynamic conditions are unstable. Watchful waiting for spontaneous absorption of air under a close monitoring is indicated in the absence of acute and life-threatening tension pneumopericardium.[2]

Iatrogenic pneumopericardium is rarely reported after pericardiocentesis, but it can lead to tension pneumopericardium, which is a life-threatening condition. Physicians should be aware of this serious complication of pericardiocentesis and take extra precautions.

Conclusion

Iatrogenic pneumopericardium caused by pericardiocentesis is very rare. However, in case of hemodynamic worsening despite complete evacuation of a hemodynamically significant pericardial effusion, it should be considered in the differential diagnosis because immediate recognition and treatment are crucial. Surgery is preferred in cases of direct breach between the pericardial cavity and hollow organs apart from lungs to close channel between pericardium and air.

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan