Advertisement

Patient-Level Stroke Outcomes Following Linkage of a Statewide Stroke Registry to Administrative Claims Data

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2835-8147/093

Patient-Level Stroke Outcomes Following Linkage of a Statewide Stroke Registry to Administrative Claims Data

  • Raed Hailat *
  • Michael P Thompson
  • Adrienne Nickles
  • J. Adam Oostema
  • J. Adam Oostema
  • Mathew J Reeves

1Michigan State University, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics.

2University of Michigan, Department of Cardiac Surgery.

3Michigan Department of Health and Human Services.

4Michigan State University, Department of Emergency Medicine.

5Michigan State University, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics.

*Corresponding Author: 10.31579/2835-8147/093

Citation: Raed Hailat, Michael P Thompson, Adrienne Nickles, J. Adam Oostema, J. Adam Oostema, et al, (2025), Patient-Level Stroke Outcomes Following Linkage of a Statewide Stroke Registry to Administrative Claims Data, Clinics in Nursing, 4(6); DOI:10.31579/2835-8147/093.

Copyright: © 2025, Raed Hailat. This is an open-access artic le distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 16 October 2025 | Accepted: 31 October 2025 | Published: 13 November 2025

Keywords: alzheimer’s disease; theta burst stimulation; neuromodulation

Abstract

Background: 

Collection of patient-level outcomes data following hospital discharge is challenging for stroke registries. Data linkage to administrative claims data is a potential solution to obtain outcomes data. We aimed to generate data on 30-day, 90-day and 1-year outcome events following hospitalization for stroke using linked data in Michigan.

Methods: 

We probabilistically linked clinical data from a 5-year cohort (2016-2020) of all index acute stroke discharges (ICD-10 I61-I63) from 31 hospitals participating in Michigan’s Acute Stroke program (MiSP) to a representative statewide multi-payer claims database. We used the linked data to generate data on 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year event rates including hospital readmissions, stroke recurrence, post-acute care services (i.e., facility-based rehabilitation and home health), and out-patient visits. Mortality data was only available for Medicare fee-for- service beneficiaries. Outcomes were stratified by age, race, stroke type, and stroke severity.

Results: 

Of the 46,330 MiSP stroke discharges, 23,918 (51.6%) were linked to the claims database. Readmission and stroke recurrence rates were 14.1% and 3.3%, respectively, at 30 days, increasing to 42.2% and 8.3% at one year. By 30 days about a quarter of subjects had used facility-based rehab and another quarter had used home health; home health utilization increased to 44.7% by one year. At all time points Black patients had significantly higher readmission rates compared to whites, but higher stroke recurrence rates were only observed at the 1-year mark. At 30 days, utilization of post-acute care services did not differ by race, but utilization rates were significantly higher in Blacks at 90 days and one year. In contrast utilization of outpatient services was significantly higher among White patients at all time points.

Conclusions: 

Linkage between acute stroke registry and claims data provides an important source of surveillance data for stroke outcomes up to 1-year post discharge. This data allows for real-time monitoring of healthcare outcomes and potentially leads to interventions to improve stroke care.

Introduction

The large volume of data collected in the national Get With The Guideline-Stroke (GWTG-S) program–now exceeding 9 million stroke discharges from more than 2,600 hospitals has allowed for the detailed examination of trends in quality of stroke care and outcomes up to the point of hospital discharge.1, 2 Yet, for stroke patients the majority of functional recovery and return to community participation occurs after hospital discharge.3 Collection of outcomes data following hospital discharge has been difficult for large stroke registries to sustain, but a potentially feasible and sustainable way to track patient outcomes is through data linkage to administrative databases that can provide information on patient outcomes including mortality, readmissions, recurrence and post-acute care utilization.4-6 Data linkage can serve an important surveillance function by providing real-time data on cardiovascular disease that can be used to track patient outcomes and improve population health.7 Therefore, using linked data from a 5-year cohort of acute stroke discharges from a representative stroke registry in Michigan, we aimed to generate descriptive data on 30-day, 90- day and 1-year outcome event rates and stratify the data by age, race, stroke type, and stroke severity.

Methods

This report adheres to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.8 The study was based on 5-year cohort of prospectively collected data of index acute ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke discharges (ICD-10 I61-I63) collected between January 2016 and December 2020 by 31 hospitals participating in the Michigan Stroke Program (MiSP). The MiSP data was probabilistically linked to a representative statewide claims database (Michigan Value Collaborative [MVC]) that included Medicare fee-for service (FFS) and private insurer data, using date of birth, sex, admission date, discharge date, and hospital ID. Both MiSP and MVC datasets were deidentified. Clinical data including demographics (age, race, sex), stroke type (ischemic and hemorrhagic), discharge disposition, and stroke severity (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS]) were based on MiSP data. The MVC dataset included all post-acute health services claims submitted to the insurance provider during the 12-month period following hospital discharge for the index event. These services include services (in- patient rehabilitation (IRF), skilled nursing facility (SNF), home health care (HHC), outpatient medical visits (OP), and hospital readmissions. Mortality data were only available for FFS beneficiaries. More information on study databases is available in the supplement. The index stroke events were defined as the patient’s first-stroke discharge during the 5-year study period. We excluded patients that died during hospitalization or were discharged to hospice care or against medical advice (Figure S1 Supplement).The claims data were used to calculate 30-day, 90-day and 1-year event rates of all-cause hospital readmissions- defined as any subsequent hospitalization within one year of the discharge date of the index event, stroke recurrence- defined as any subsequent stroke-related hospital discharge occurring within one year of the index stroke, use of post-acute care services (i.e., IRF, SNF, and HHC), and use of OP visits- defined as any outpatient claim for primary or specialty care. Home time- defined as post discharge time spent alive and out of an inpatient care setting (i.e., hospital, IRF, SNF, or Long term acute care hospital), was only calculated for FFS beneficiaries since mortality data were available for this group.9 One year Kaplan-Meier curves for mortality, all-cause readmission, and stroke recurrence were generated. We stratified outcomes according to age, race, stroke type and severity. Data analysis was done using SAS software v9.4 (Cary, NC).

Results

Data linkage was conducted between the 46,330 MiSP and 30,685 MVC acute stroke discharges and resulted in 19,382 matched index strokes. The final linked cohort were predominantly older (>65 years, 78.5%), white (79.7%), female (52.2%), and insured by Medicare FFS (62.9%) (Table 1). 

Variable

Value

Distribution N (%)

 

Age category

<65>

4,167 (21.5)

65-74

5,672 (29.2)

75-84

5,589 (28.8)

>=85

3,954 (20.4)

 

Race

White

15,457 (79.7)

Black

2,833 (14.6)

Other*

255 (1.3)

Not documented

837 (4.3)

Latino ethnicity

No/Unable to determine

18,665 (96.3)

Yes

717 (3.7)

Sex

Male

9,265 (47.8)

Female

10,117 (52.2)

 

Insurance

Private (Preferred Provider Organization (PPO)and

Health Maintenance Organization (HMO))

3,140 (16.2)

Medicare Advantage (MA)

4,051 (20.9)

Medicare FeeFor Service (FFS)

12,191 (62.9)

Stroke type

Ischemic

16,921 (87.3)

 

Hemorrhagic

2,461 (12.7)

Admission NIHSS

0

2,985 (15.4)

 

1-4

7,937 (41.0)

 

5-15

4,955 (25.6)

 

16-20

830 (4.3)

 

>20

733 (3.8)

 

Not documented

1,942 (10.0)

Discharge disposition

Home

9,710 (50.1)

 

Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF)

4,821 (24.9)

 

Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF)

4,148 (21.4)

 

Long Term Care Hospital (LTCH)

122 (0.6)

 

Not determined

581 (3.0)

Table 1: Descriptive characteristics of a 5-year cohort of linked index stroke events (N=19,382).

The majority of index hospitalizations were ischemic stroke (87.3%), with a predominance of minor stroke (NIHSS <5>

Outcome (N=19,382)*

30-day event rate n (%)

90-day event rate n (%)

1-year event rate n (%)

All cause readmission

2,724(14.1)

4,833 (24.9)

8,169(42.2)

Stroke recurrence**

641 (3.3)

991 (5.1)

1,614(8.3)

Inpatient rehabilitation facility utilization

4,822(24.9)

4,946 (25.5)

5,171(26.7)

Skilled nursingfacility utilization

5,449(28.1)

6,049 (31.2)

6,765(34.9)

Home health utilization

5,336(27.5)

7,436 (38.4)

8,659(44.7)

Outpatient visit***

8,999(46.4)

13,720 (70.8)

16,539 (85.3)

Mortality^

486 (4.0)

1,109 (9.1)

2,416(19.8)

Home time-Median days (IQR)**

22.0 (26.0)

79.0 (40.0)

347.0 (94.0)

Table 2: Thirty-day, 90-day, and 1-year post stroke discharge outcome event rates among a 5-year cohort of 19,382 linked stroke events.

Only 3.3% of the linked population had a recurrent stroke event (defined as a hospital readmission with a primary discharge diagnosis of stroke) within 30 days; this increased to 5.1% at 90 days and to8.3% at one year (Table 2 and Figure 1B).

In terms of use of post-acute services, 24.9%, 28.1%, 27.5% of the linked cohort utilized IRF, SNF, and HHC within 30 days of hospital discharge, respectively (Table 2). While IRF and SNF utilization rates increased only slightly at 90 days (25.5% and 31.2%, respectively), HHC utilization increased substantially to 38.4% at 90 days and 44.7% by one year (Table 2). By 30 days, 90 days, and one year of follow-up, 46.4%, 70.8%, and 85.3% of the cohort had at least one OP visit, respectively. For the 12,185 Medicare FFS linked index events, mortality rates were 4.0%, 9.1%, and 19.8% at 30 days, 90 days, and one year post discharge, respectively (Table 2 and Figure 1C). 

Median home time was 22, 79, and 347 days at 30 days, 90 days, and one year, respectively (Table 2). Compared to the <65 xss=removed xss=removed>

the ≥65 years old group over the entire one year follow up period, but IRF utilization did not differ; OP services were utilized at a higher rate up to 90 days post discharge compared to the <65 xss=removed xss=removed>15) had the highest all-cause readmission rates but stroke recurrence did not differ by severity (Table S4). Utilization of health care services was strongly impacted by stroke severity; IRF and HHC utilization rates were the highest among patients with moderate stroke (NIHSS 5-15), while SNF utilization was highest in patients with severe stroke patient group, and OP utilization was highest among mild stroke (NIHS < 5>

Discussion

We generated descriptive data on 30-day, 90-day and 1-year outcome event rates using linked data from a 5-year cohort of acute stroke discharges from Michigan. Our data fulfills the American Heart Associations call for real time collection and analysis of cardiovascular disease surveillance data which is important to identify at-risk groups, and drive advancements in prevention and treatment strategies, including precision health and policy development.7 The overall stroke outcome event rates generated in this analysis were generally similar to those previously published. Our 30-day and 1-year readmission rates were very similar to those reported by a recent meta-analysis that found pooled 30-day and 1-year all-cause stroke readmission rates of 17.4% and 42.5%, respectively.10 Our 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year stroke recurrence rates were also similar to a report that examined 2017 Medicare FFS cases with ischemic stroke that found 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year recurrence rates of 2.4%, 4.0%, and 7.6%, respectively.11 With respect to health care utilization post hospital discharge, our 30-day utilization rates for IRF were similar but SNF and HHC rates were above what a nationally representative GWTG-S population study conducted between 2003 and 2011 reported on.12 However, the GWTG-S study collected their data at the point of discharge, whereas our data was based on actual claims accrued during the 30 days post discharge period which explains the higher 30-day rates of SNF and HHC utilization. We observed increasing rates of SNF and HHC utilization from 30 days to 90 days which points to the fact that many patients initially discharged without these services end up using them. Regarding OP visits, our rates are similar to utilization rates reported by a nationally representative claims database of commercially insured Americans from 2009 to 2015, where 70.8% of acute stroke patients had a primary care visit within 90 days post discharge.13 The value of obtaining patient outcome data from data linkage has been illustrated by previous studies that have linked the GWTG-S registry to Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) data.14-22 However, these reports do not include stroke patients younger than 65 years or Medicare Advantage beneficiaries which are a rapidly growing population.5, 23-25 Data on post discharge OP medical visits utilization is also very important to track adherence to OP treatment and secondary prevention efforts. Of the remaining outcomes examined, our 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality rates were similar to rates of prior FFS population with minor stroke, where 30-day, 90-day and 1-year all- cause mortality were reported as 3.7%, 7.6%, and 17.2%, respectively.20 The calculated median 90-day and 1-year median home time estimates of 79 and 347 days were similar to prior data report that also used Medicare FFS population (90-day: 79 days; 1-year: 349 days).17 Home time can be used to track stroke recovery post discharge as it is recognized as a valid proxy measure of functional recovery in prior studies.17, 26-30 The ability to stratify the outcomes data by race and stroke severity shed light at the importance of data linkage in enabling these stratifications which are usually not able to be generated from claims data alone. It also emphasizes the important differences in event rates and use of post discharge services across subgroups which is relevant to developing patient specific post discharge follow up plans.31, 32 This study found important difference by age and race. We found as expected that older age groups had higher readmission rates, but it was unexpected to find lower stroke recurrence rates in older subjects. Prior studies of stroke recurrence in the young versus older patients are relatively unusual; the South London Stroke registry reported no difference in stroke recurrence rates between <65>

Acknowledgments

None

Sources of Funding

Supported by American Heart Association grant #909423/Dr. Raed Hailat/2022

Disclosures

Support for the Michigan Value Collaborative is provided by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan as part of the BCBSM Value Partnerships program; however, the opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed by the author do not necessarily reflect those of BCBSM or any of its employees.

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan