Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2835-7957/038
Introducing Speech Audiometry in Albanian Language
- Xhuvani Adrian 1*
- Ferrary Evelyne 2
- Vasili Dritan 3
- Hervochon Remi 1
- Beci Bahri 6
- Boci Besim 7
- Tankere Frederic 1
1 ENT Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
2 Technologies etv thérapie génique pour la surdité, Institut de l’audition, Pasteur/INSERM, Paris, France.
3 ENT Department Salus Hospital, Tirana, Albania.
4 ENT Department, Hygeia Hospital, Tirana, Albania.
5 Phonetician, Paris, France.
6 ENT Department Mother Theresa Hospital, Tirana, Albania.
*Corresponding Author: Xhuvani Adrian, ENT Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP Sorbonne University, Paris, France
Citation: Xhuvani Adrian, Ferrary Evelyne, Vasili Dritan, Sulaj Holta, Hervochon Remi, et al (2023), Introducing Speech Audiometry in Albanian Language, Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, 2(6); DOI:10.31579/2835-7957/038
Copyright: © 2023, Xhuvani Adrian. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 14 August 2023 | Accepted: 28 August 2023 | Published: 11 October 2023
Keywords: speech audiometry; albania; audiology; pediatrics
Abstract
There are no validated speech audiometry lists of words in Albanian. The aim of this study was to create and evaluate lists of words for children and young adults with normal hearing.
In total, 20 lists of 10 spondaic dissyllabic words were created, taking into account the idiosyncrasies of the Albanian Language. Eighty-three (83) young adults and eighty-six (86) children were included in this study from November 2018 to November 2019. For each patient’s ear the difference between the Speech Recognition Threshold (SRT) and the Pure Tone Average threshold (PTA) was calculated to analyse if the value was less or equal to 7 dB in order to validate the 20 wordlists.
The psychometric function slope of the resulted speech audiometry graph was also calculated to compare it with the ones of other Indo-European languages.
The difference between the SRT and PTA was 3.2 +/- 2.1 dB in adults and 3.3 + /- 2.4 dB in children. A value ≤ 7 dB was observed in 93 % of adults and 92% of children. The psychometric function slope was 7.3%/ dB in adults and 7.9%/ dB in children, similar to those found in other Indo-European languages.
Speech audiometry in the Albanian Language can now be performed using the lists defined in the present study.
Introduction
Listening is a function of the perception of an acoustic signal and at the same time it realizes its identification.
Vocal audiometry plays a crucial role in assessing hearing capacity and assessing the possibility of speech recognition by the human hearing apparatus.
Vocal audiometry is an examination, a test, used to diagnose hearing problems. It requires an implication not only of the neurosensory apparatus of hearing, but also, the knowledge of the spoken language, and the culture associated with a particular language as it is based on a list of specific words.
The first studies on vocal audiometry were done by a monk (L’Abbé ROUSSELOT, 1886-1924).
In the middle of the 20th century, first wordlists were created in English (Hudgins & Hawkins, 1947), in French (Fournier, 1951; Lafon 1964), in Italian (Azzi Bocca Pellegrini, 1950), in Russian (Aleksandrowski, 1998), in Polish (Skarzynski, 2004).
In the clinical practice of auditory balance, there are two forms of vocal audiometry: vocal audiometry for adults and vocal audiometry for children. This is due to the different spoken vocabulary used by these two age groups.
In adults, vocal audiometry is a more sensitive and accurate indicator than tonal audiometry in various auditory pathologies, such as "immediate deafness" or neurological pathology.
Vocal audiometry is an irreplaceable tool for the auditory examination of a patient who wants to use a hearing prosthesis.
In children, vocal audiometry is used to:
- assess the child's ability to repeat words and his/ her communication development
- help in deciding if an “auditory rehabilitation” or an auditory prosthesis is necessary (in case we are dealing with a child with significant hearing loss)
- make it possible in a concrete and visual way for the child's parents to understand the lack of the child's ability to hear and understand a word or phrase
- help in a concrete way in choosing the type of hearing prosthesis (conventional device or cochlear implant)
The purpose of speech audiometry is to assess the intelligibility, which is the ability to perceive and process speech, by understanding and repeating correctly a specific list of words. This test, which is frequently associated with pure tone audiometry, helps to better qualify hearing impairment.
The patient is presented with different lists of ten words (disyllabic) at different sound intensities, for each ear. The results of the vocal audiometry is then represented on a graph for each ear with the sound intensity in decibels (dB) on the abscissa, and the percentage of words understood on the ordinate. The curve takes on a sigmoid shape in healthy subjects. One of the most fundamental measures in speech audiometry is the Speech Recognition Threshold (SRT). It is defined as the lowest level in dB HL at which an individual can correctly identify 50% of the words (« Guidelines for Determining Threshold Level for Speech », 1988). As for the maximum of intelligibility, it is the highest point on the curve. (Figure 1)

Familiarity, homogeneity and standardisation are critical elements to consider when creating lists for speech audiometry evaluations. Because the purpose of SRT testing is to measure the auditory threshold for speech, the words selected as stimuli should be as familiar as possible (Hudkins & Hawlins, 1947, Jahner et al, 1994; Young et al, 1982)
Objectives
The first goal of this study was to create 20 lists of 10 words each, dealing with the following criteria:
- dissyllabic words with 4 or 5 phonemes
- familiar to each age group (adults or children)
- auditory and grammatically homogenous
- phonetically different in spectral analysis.
- almost all the phonemes of the language must be represented in a list of 10 words, taking into consideration the occurrence of these phonemes in the Albanian Language.
- each syllable must be pronounced at the same intensity (spondaic words).
The second goal of the study was to evaluate these lists of words in the Albanian Language in a sample of children and adults with normal hearing, by comparing SRT and PTA. Indeed, to validate these lists, the difference between SRT and PTA thresholds (average 500, 1000, 2000, 4000 Hz) must be less than or equal to 7 or 10 dB (Teplitzky et al, 2009).
Some Characteristics of The Albanian Language
The Albanian Language contains 36 letters: 7 vowels and 29 consonants, of which 9 are digraphs. A letter represents a phoneme. Most of the syllables are “open syllables CV” (starting with a consonant - C - followed
by a vowel - V). 92% of words start with a consonant. 67% of words end with a vowel.
The phoneme « ë » is used in about 29% at the end of words, but it is a deaf phoneme and as such it is not used (only spondaic words are chosen).
The average length of a word in Albanian is 1.8 syllables / 4 phonemes.
Vowels are rare at the beginning of a word; only 8.02% of words start with them, while 91.98% of words start with consonants (digraph or not).
The selected words are always used in the nominative form (Prominent form).
The phonetic principle is the basic principle of orthography of the Albanian Language not only because in the Albanian Language words are written as they are pronounced, but also for because the phonetic principle corresponds to the morphological principle of the word.
Materials and Methods
Twenty lists of ten words were created, meeting the criteria mentioned in the “OBJECTIVES” paragraph and the idiosyncrasies of the Albanian Language (Figure 2). Thus, all words started with a consonant, and no word ending with the phoneme « ë » was selected since it is a deaf phoneme.
Another criteria taken into consideration is that each wordlist contains all frequencies of the Albanian Language. A special software program (Sound spectral analysis; AUDACITY programs) allowed for acoustic analysis of spondaic words and made it possible to find the words with equal phonetic value in Albanian Language. (FIGURE 3)
Each list contains 10 words (one word = 10% on the intelligibility scale).
List 1 | List 2 | List 3 | List 4 | List 5 | List 6 | List 7 | List 8 | List 9 | List 10 | |
Adults | Pinca Vëndi Lëngu Kafsha Bari Pyka Dhëmbi Fuçia Demi Kocka | Pragu Tulla Gishti Peshku Busti Krimbi Porta Plaga Trungu Vesa | Njolla Dëngu Truri Forma Klubi Tregu Lakra Brazda Kushti Bloza | Lista Peshku Plaku Muri Gjesti Qëngji Shkëmbi Gjoksi Shuli Veshka | Kashta Shkalla Kllapa Pisha Vepra Mushka Varka Birra Plumbi Pushka | Grimca Lënda Kisha Gjuha Cungu Gozhda Zemra Brumi Pirgu Basti | Tanku Djathi Bota Motra Kocka Predha Trari Bluza Vajza Dushi | Gjalpi Supi Gjëza Brryli Vrima Shansi Salla Posta Shega Lisi | Fshati Shtegu Filmi Shtypi Delja Ngjyra Gripi Sherri Kafja Kyçi | Koka Derri Rrushi Bregu Deti Sheshi Banka Viçi Sofra Xhami |
Children | Balli Syri Gjuri Lufta Goma Kali Babi Puna Libri Darka | Veza Mami Dora Buka Lecka Boja Kosi Luga Furça Topi | Lapsi Shoku Thesi Vula Goja Trimi Lulja Pasta Tymi Rrota | Çanta Treni Kënga Dera Gjumi Noti Pleshti Rrufa Ferra Pema | Pula Buza Mali Xhaja Gjeli Burri Gota Vapa Kolla Dielli | Gjyshi Leshi Macja Zogu Bora Rrypi Luani Pjata Dreka Gruri | Kripa Gjaku Shala Xhaxhi Thika Krahu Toka Drita Guri Dimri | Veshi Triko Lumi Qeni Nata Gryka Forca Shteti Lodra Fshesa | Shkolla Çifti Pulla Fusha Pika Kati Princi Nëna Miku Koha | Llampa Torta Shkopi Fiku Supa Barku Sharra Xhepi Këmba Pylli |
Figure 2: The 20 wordlists created

Figure 3: Sound spectral analysis of some selected words from the lists (translated)
From November 2018 to November 2019 we included 83 adults aged 18 to 25 years old and 86 children aged 5 to 14 years old with no otological story. They were all of Albanian origin and all spoke Albanian.
Examination of the external auditory channel and tympanic membrane was normal for all subjects. Tympanometry was normal for all subjects (Tympanometry type A). They all had normal tonal hearing, which corresponds to an average loss of less 26 dB hl from 250 to 8000 Hz (Silman & Silverman’s classification system) or less than 20 dB SPL.
All subjects or their legal representatives gave their written consent.
We used the following equipment: a type 1 of Audiometer (IEC 60645-1; IEC 60645. Type A) INTER ACOUSTICS AD229b calibrated in October 2018, a SENNHEISER HDA 200 type headset, a standard audiometric booth (ambient noise < 30dBA>
The CD player used was the PANASSONIC SA PMX80.
The speech audiometry test was performed using the top-down method, every 3 dB, with the created wordlists. In order to achieve the vocal curve, each patient heard and repeated 7 wordlists per ear, all independent and different.
The test duration was approximately 35 min: 10 minutes of pure tone audiometry, 5 minutes of tympanometry and 20 min of speech audiometry.
For each subject and for each ear, we calculated the absolute value of the difference between SRT and PTA thresholds. The PTA thresholds were obtained by calculating the average of the tonal thresholds at frequencies 500 Hz 1000 Hz, 2000 Hz and 4000 Hz.
Then we calculated the average of these differences within the adult population and within the pediatric population. (Figure 4)
Psychometric function slope (%/dB) from 20 to 80 % was also calculated on two curves corresponding to the averaging of the curves of all the ears tested within the adult group and the pediatric group.

Figure 4: Illustration of the speech audiometry for the adult patient 6
Results
Among the 83 adults, there were 17 men and 66 women. 62 subjects were between 18 and 21 years old and 21 subjects were 22 years old or older. Of the 166 ears tested, the difference between SRT and PTA was 3.17 +/- 2.14 dB (mean+/- standard deviation). Only one ear had a difference of more than 10 dB, 10 ears had a difference between 7 and 10 dB, and 155
ears had a difference of 7 dB or less in terms of absolute value between SRT and PTA.
By averaging all the curves obtained in adults, we obtain a sigmoid: 0% at 0 dB, 50% at 9 dB, 59% at 10 dB, and 100% at 20 dB (Figure 5)

Among the 86 children, there were 49 boys and 37 girls. Twenty subjects were between 5 and 7 years old, 40 subjects were between 8 and 10 years old, and 26 subjects were between 11 and 14 years old. Of the 172 ears tested the difference between SRT and PTA was 3.26 +/- 2.41dB, (mean +/- standard deviation). Thirteen ears had a difference between 7 and 10
dB, and 159 ears had a difference of 7 dB, or less in terms of absolute value between SRT and PTA.
By averaging all the curves obtained in pediatric subjects, a sigmoid is obtained 0% at 0 dB, 26% at 5 dB, 50% at 9 dB, 100% at 20 dB (FIGURE 6). Psychometric function slope from 20 to 80% was 7.5%/ dB.

Discussion
The primary aim of the study was to develop standardized Speech Audiometry Wordlists in Albanian, that will be used in the future to better diagnose and monitor hearing and speech pathology in Albanian population (adults and children).We have been able to develop a set of Albanian dissyllabic wordlists which are homogeneous in performance with respect to audibility and psychometric function slope for subjects with normal hearing.
In other Indo-European languages, the main slopes have also been similar to those found in the present study: between 7.2%/dB, and 10%/dB in English (Hudkins & Hawkins, 194 7 ; Wilson & Strouse, 1999) between 9.8 and 10.1%/dB in Polish (Harris, 2004) between 9.7 and 11.1%/dB in Spanish (Nissen, 2005) and around 13%/dB in Italian (Puglisi and al, 2015).
To our knowledge, our work is the first dealing with the speech audiometry in the Albanian language. Since this study was performed on children and adults with normal hearing, it would be useful in the future to conduct further studies with patients with hearing loss of various levels.
Conclusion
Speech audiometry in Albanian Language can be performed with these wordlists studied in this research.
Conflict of Interest
None.
Acknowledgment
For the realization of this study we would like to give special thanks to:
- Patrick BOUAZIS, Audioprothésiste, Paris, France
- Marc BOULET, Audioprothésiste, Paris, France
- Diana XHUVANI, Consultant in strategy & management, Paris, France
References
- Guidelines for determining threshold level for speech. ASHA 1988; 30:85–89.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Favier V, Vincent C, Bizaguet É, Bouccara D, Dauman R et al. (2018). Consensus formalise de la SFORL (version courte) a audiométrie de l’adulte et de l’enfant. Annales françaises d’Oto-rhino-laryngologie et de Pathologie Cervico-faciale 135:335–342.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Hudgins CV, Hawkins JE. (1947). The development of recorded auditory tests for measuring hearing loss for speech. Laryngoscope. 57:57–89.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Jahner JA, Schlauch RA, Doyle T. (1994). A comparison of American Speech-Language Hearing Association guidelines for obtaining speech-recognition thresholds. Ear Hear. 15:324–329.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Young LL, Dudley B, Gunter MB. (1982). Thresholds and psychometric functions of the individual spondaic words. J Speech Hear Res 25: 586–593.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Wilson RB, Erskine C, Crowe PJ. (2014). Hypomagnesemia and Hypocalcemia after Thyroidectomy: Prospective Study. World J Surg 24:722–726.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Richard C, Decker M, Ben Njima I, Jeanvoine A, Fourcaud-Trocmé N. et al. (2014). Équilibrage de listes de mots dissyllabiques sur critères acoustiques, linguistiques et psychométriques. Application à l’audiométrie vocale. Annales françaises d’Oto-rhino-laryngologie et de Pathologie Cervico-faciale 131: A166.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Fournier JE. (1951). Audiométrie vocale: les épreuves d’intelligibilité et leurs applications au diagnostic, à l’expertise et à la correction prothétique des surdités. Maloine.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Lafon JC. (1964). [AUDIOMETRY WITH THE PHONETIC TEST]. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 18:619–633.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Aleksandrovsky IV, McCullough JK, Wilson RH. (1998). Development of suprathreshold word recognition test for Russian-speaking patients. J Am Acad Audiol 9:417–425.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Ashoor AA, Prochazka T. (1985). Saudi Arabic speech audiometry for children. Br J Audiol 19: 229–238.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Nissen SL, Harris RW, Jennings L-J, Eggett DL, Buck H. (2005). Psychometrically words for speech reception threshold testing in Mandarin. International Journal of Audiology 44: 391–399.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Teplitzky TB, Angster K, Rosso LE, Ferruggiaro AR, Isaiah A. et al. (2019). The Role of Cognitive Evaluation in Predicting Successful Audiometric Testing among Children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 160:1106–1110.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Wilson RH, Carter AS. (2001). Relation between slopes of word recognition psychometric functions and homogeneity of the stimulus materials. J Am Acad Audiol 12:7–14.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Puglisi GE, Warzybok A, Hochmuth S, Visentin C, Astolfi A. et al. (2015). An Italian matrixsentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise. Int J Audiol. 54 Suppl 2: 44– 50.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - HAXHIAJ Lianda, L’Albanais une langue en mouvement. Ed l’Harmattan 2012.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Sterkers - Artières, Christophe Vincent Audiométrie de l’enfant et de l’adulte. Rapport de la Société Française d’ORL et de Chirurgie Cervico-Faciale 2014.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Société française d’audiologie. Guide des bonnes pratiques en audiométrie de l’adulte. Paris: Société française d’audiologie 2006.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - DIKA Agim; Rilindja, 1984.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - DODI A. Fonetika dhe Fonologjia e gjuhes shqipe , Tirana 2004.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - BECI B. Fonetika e gjuhes shqipe. ed EDFA, 2004.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Précis d’audioprothèse. Tome 1 : Le bilan d’orientation prothétique. Les Editions du Collège National d’Audioprothèse, 2007.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Précis d’audioprothèse. Tome 3: L’appareillage de l’adulte. Les Editions du Collège National d’Audioprothèse, 2007.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Sallavaci Y Suela: Shurdhesite tek Femijet; Trajtimi i tyre, 2007, Monografi
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Portmann M, Portmann CL. Précis d’audiométrie Clinique, 6 éd. Paris: Masson, 1998.Bonfils P, Van Den Abbeele T, Ané P. Exploration fonctionnelle auditive. Encycl Méd Chir (Editions Scientifiques et Médicales Elsevier SAS), Oto-rhino-laryngologie, 1998, 20-175-A-10, 16p.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar - Legent F, Bordure P, Calais C, Malard O. Audiologie pratique. Manuel pratique des tests de l’audition, 2 éd. Paris Masson, 2002.
View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar