Advertisement

Feedback of Postgraduate trainees about Communication Skills workshop at Rawalpindi Medical University, Pakistan

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2835-835X/123

Feedback of Postgraduate trainees about Communication Skills workshop at Rawalpindi Medical University, Pakistan

  • Rizwana Shahid

Associate Professor Community Medicine, Rawalpindi Medical University.

*Corresponding Author: Rizwana Shahid, Associate Professor Community Medicine, Rawalpindi Medical University.

Citation: Rizwana Shahid, (2025), Feedback of Postgraduate trainees about Communication Skills workshop at Rawalpindi Medical University, Pakistan, Clinical Trials and Case Studies, 5(2); DOI:10.31579/2835-835X/123

Copyright: © 2025, Rizwana Shahid. This is an open-access artic le distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 12 March 2026 | Accepted: 20 March 2026 | Published: 27 March 2026

Keywords: postgraduate trainees, communication skills, educational environment, competent facilitators

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the feedback of postgraduate trainees about communication skills workshop organized at Rawalpindi Medical University

Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was planned to get the feedback of 48 postgraduate residents who attended a communication skills workshop for 3 days to fulfill their training requirements outlined in the curriculum. The responses were gathered through structured feedback proforma filled by trainees on completion of workshop. The feedback was recorded on 5-point Likert scale. Data was analyzed by using SPSS version 27.0. Descriptive statistics were applied.

Results: Overall means score related to the feedback of communication skills workshop was 4.5 ± 0.53. The highest mean score (4.60 ± 0.49) secured was for clarification of queries in the workshop followed by relevancy of the workshop (4.54 ± 0.50) to the educational needs of the trainees and conduciveness of the educational environment (4.45 ± 0.50). All the trainees appreciated the comprehensive command of the workshop facilitators over the subject and opportunities for meaningful interaction among participants.

Conclusion: Trainees applauded the ample opportunities available to them for interaction in the workshop and competency of the facilitators. They expressed strong agreement regarding fulfillment of their educational needs and provision of supporting learning environment. 

Introduction

Clear and productive communication is of paramount significance for effective medical practice. It is deemed necessary for a strong doctor-patient relationship[1]. Coherent communication strengthens patients’ trust in their consultants and hence enhances their satisfaction with their provision of healthcare services[2]. Effective patient-doctor communication is imperative for improving somatic and psychosocial health of the patients as apart from their motivation it ensures their participation in decision making[3]. 

Communication skills have substantially been acknowledged as a core competency in postgraduate medical training and it is mandatory to be equipped with this competency in order to be certified as a skilled healthcare professional[4]. Communication skills are requisite to accomplish a variety of clinical tasks like history taking, getting informed consent, counseling the clients, briefing treatment options and breaking bad news5. Communication gap between patient and healthcare provider may lead to diagnostic and treatment errors that are mainly attributed to language barriers and unjustified resource distribution [6]. 

Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has specified interpersonal and communication skills essential for effective patient management and enhancing the healthcare outcomes of the population at large[7]. Cross-sectional data from Low Middle Income Countries (LMICs) emphasized the need for a robust communication skills program of residents and fellow trainees to amplify the patients’ degree of satisfaction with healthcare services[8]. Communication failure drastically impair the quality of healthcare and puts the patients’ safety at risk[9]. 

Securing the feedback of medical trainees pertaining to communication skills workshop is considerably crucial to do necessary refinement accordingly and to promote patient-centered training[10]. The present study is hence intended to evaluate the feedback of postgraduate residents who are undergoing training at teaching hospitals affiliated with a public sector University. This study would definitely enable to systematically identify the domains needing improvement and to address the growing expectations of our healthcare system. 

Subjects & Methods

A cross-sectional descriptive study was done by securing the feedback of 48 postgraduate trainees who attended a 3 days communication skills workshop at Rawalpindi Medical University to fulfill their training requisites as per curriculum. The responses were garnered by getting structured feedback proforma filled at the end of workshop. The feedback was taken on 5-point Likert scale as per institutional policy that is later submitted to Quality Enhancement Cell (QEC) for comprehensive analysis. This study was carried out and reported in accordance with STROBE guidelines specified by Equator Network[11]. Data was analyzed by using SPSS version 27.0. Descriptive statistics were applied.

Results

The feedback was gathered from 48 postgraduate trainees about Communication skills workshop that was carried out for 3 days during November 2024 to fulfill the training requisites. The feedback was collected from the residents who were undergoing training in different specialties as shown below in Table 1. 

Sr. #

Training Programs  

No (%) of Trainees 

  1.  

MS Anesthesiology 

7

  1.  

MS Obstetrics & Gynecology 

7

  1.  

MS Urology 

4

  1.  

MD Paediatrics 

4

  1.  

MD Psychiatry 

4

  1.  

MD Nephrology 

4

  1.  

MS General Surgery 

4

  1.  

MD Internal Medicine 

3

  1.  

MS Plastic Surgery 

3

  1.  

MS Orthopedics

2

  1.  

MD Cardiology 

1

  1.  

MD Emergency Medicine 

1

  1.  

MD Nephrology 

1

  1.  

MS Otorhinolaryngology (ENT)

1

  1.  

MS Ophthalmology 

1

  1.  

MD Radiology 

1

Total

48

Table 1: Trainees from different specialties participating in the communication skills workshop

The content covered in this workshop was related to breaking bad news, conflict resolution, enhancing patient-centered and interprofessional communication, fostering a culture of respect and collaboration and managing difficult conversations. Of the 48 trainees, 24 just agreed while rest of the 24 strongly agreed with the achievement of the workshop objectives with higher mean score achieved (4.5 ± 0.50). Trainees found their workshop facilitators quite competent as depicted below in Figure 1. 

Figure 1: feedback of the trainees about extensive command of facilitators over subject matter

 Comprehensive responses of the trainees pertaining to various parameters of the workshop are illustrated below in Table 2. 

Parameters of the workshop 

Responses

Mean score 

(mean ± SD)

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Learning experience was relevant to the objectives 

47%

51%

2%

4.45 ± 0.54

Learning session was relevant to their educational needs 

46.9%

53.1%

----

4.54 ± 0.50

The time given to each component of the workshop was appropriate 

49%

42.9%

8.1%

4.43 ± 0.61

The environment was conducive to learning 

49%

44.9%

6.1%

4.45 ± 0.50

Key points were summarized at the end 

55.1%

44.9%

-----

4.43 ± 0.50

Queries were clarified 

61.2%

38.8%

-----

4.60 ± 0.49

The reading material provided was relevant to the session 

46.9%

53.1%

-----

4.35 ± 0.66

Table 2: Responses of the trainees about different attributes of communication skills workshop (mean ± SD)

•               SD- Standard Deviation

Of the 48 trainees, 27 strongly agreed with the provision of adequate opportunities and avenues for interaction in the workshop as shown below in 

Figure 2: Feedback of trainees regarding provision of ample platforms for interaction in the workshop

Most of the trainees agreed with attainment of learning objectives specified for communication skills workshop. Overall mean score pertaining to this workshop was 4.5 ± 0.53. However, neutral responses regarding timeline of the workshop and conduciveness of learning climate were received from Plastic Surgery and Nephrology trainees. 

Discussion

Of the 48 postgraduate trainees who attended the communication skills workshop, 93.9% agreed that the educational environment was encouraging and facilitated their learning (4.45 ± 0.50) as evident from Table 2. This depicts the provision of supportive learning climate that promoted the acquisition of requisite skills. Conducive learning environment is the key element for long term learning of the students. Apart from inducing a sense of achievement, it also escalates the likelihood of academic success[12].  It not only motivates the students for learning but also enhances their emotional well-being[13]. Workshops of the professional fields designed as healthy interactive sessions endorse active and constructive learning. They not only ensure the achievement of the specified learning outcomes but also provide a collaborative learning platform for acquiring practical competencies. Workshop trainers are therefore directed to design the learning session in accordance with ADDIE framework to certify the accomplishment of intended learning objectives[14]. A systematic review by Bylund CL et al revealed that learning session organized for acquisition of communication skills promoted considerable experiential learning that greatly influenced the attitudes and behaviors of Graduate Medical Education (GME) residents[15]. Likewise, a study by Piryani RM et al carried out at an Institute of Medicine at Nepal was illustrative of getting a remarkable feedback from the workshop participants in terms of achieving the learning outcomes, interesting session and its practicality for future exercise[16]. A mixed method sequential study done by among postgraduate residents of public sector tertiary care facilities by using PHEEM questionnaire elucidated that learning climate at their workplace was somewhat compromised that emphasized the need to improve their workplace not only for their enhanced learning but also to augment healthcare of the patients[17]. Conducive learning environment hence are deemed necessary to foster collaborative learning among the participants and promote reflective practice for experiential learning. 

About 60.4% of the trainees strongly agreed with the firm command of the workshop facilitators over the content delivered and they effectively helped the trainees grasp the required skills. Facilitators with adequate mastery of the content and expertise not only have enough confidence to execute interactive sessions but also promote the acquisition of requires competencies by the participants[18]. Consistent with our findings, a study among physicians revealed that they strongly agreed with efficient execution of communications skills workshop and perceived their session facilitators highly knowledgeable about the subject matter[19]. Interactive teaching sessions coupled with role plays and reflective practices ensure participants’ engagements and achievement of intended learning objectives[20]. Better communication skills acquired by healthcare providers through interactive training sessions also improved the patients’ satisfaction with healthcare system[21]. Capacity building of the master trainers for effective workshops execution through holistic and meaningful interaction can prove beneficial in acquisition of requisite competencies. 

91.9% of the trainees in present study agreed with the time allotted to coverage of each component of communication skills workshop. Communication skills workshop planned for the postgraduate trainees are meant to acquire competencies pertaining to handling of challenging patients’ interaction proficiently and ethically. Apart from breaking bad news sensibly, trainees should be able to identify the communication barriers and able to overcome them intelligently. A study by Baile WF et al elucidated that communication skills workshops of oncologists enabled them to break bad news ethically and to improvise their communication skills at their workplace[22]. A 2-days communication skills workshop planned for healthcare professionals of Qatar received substantial appreciation and its module on breaking bad news was applauded the most[23]. Communicating with the patients and their attendants ethically enable them to cope up with the poor prognosis and to make informed decisions pertaining to their treatment[24]. A national mixed method study by Abdullah MA et al explored that only few clinicians in Pakistan were formally trained for breaking bad news. Moreover, this study emphasized the need for rapport building with the patients and through discussion with patients and attendants regarding disease prognosis and the strategize to normalize the scenario[25]. Although it is very stressful for the physicians to break bad news, but communication skills workshop enables them to remain emotionally stable while fulfilling such responsibilities and promotes patient satisfaction and psychological resilience with poor prognosis.

Conclusion & Recommendations

Postgraduate trainees of public sector teaching hospitals were much satisfied with various attributes of workshop like competent facilitators, achievement of specified learning outcomes and conduciveness of the learning climate. Trainees strongly commended the provision of ample opportunities for interaction in the session through role plays. As feedback was garnered from few postgraduate trainees, securing feedback from more trainees would prove beneficial in gaining the holistic viewpoint about this mandatory training session. 

Conflicts Of Interest:

The authors declared no conflict of interest. 

Source Of Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship and or publication of this article. 

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan