Advertisement

Cognitive Dysfunction: An Important Feature of Major Depressive Disorder

Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2834-5134/011

Cognitive Dysfunction: An Important Feature of Major Depressive Disorder

  • Xiao-Hui Li 1
  • Xue-Min Cui 1
  • Wang Wang 1,3
  • Lin Yang 1,3
  • Hong-Can Zhu 2,4
  • Dong-Xiao Duan 1,4*

1 Department of Physiology and Neurobiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, 100 Science Avenue, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China

2 Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 40 Daxue Road, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, China

3 The Academy of Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, 40 Daxue Road, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, China

4 These authors have contributed equally to this work.

*Corresponding Author: Dong-Xiao Duan, Department of Physiology and Neurobiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University 100 Science Avenue, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China.

Citation: Xiao-Hui Li, Xue-Min Cui, Wang Wang1, Lin Yang, Hong-Can Zhu2, Dong-Xiao Duan, (2023). Cognitive dysfunction: An important feature of major depressive disorder. Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2(1) DOI:10.31579/2834-5134/011

Copyright: © 2023 Dong-Xiao Duan, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 04 January 2023 | Accepted: 11 January 2023 | Published: 19 January 2023

Keywords: cognitive dysfunction; major depressive disorder; physical therapy; psychotherapy; hippocampus; exercise therapy

Abstract

Depression is a common mental illness with high prevalence, disability, and suicide rates. Most patients experience recurrent attacks, which converts depression into a chronic disease. 

Introduction:

Depression is a common mental illness with high prevalence, disability, and suicide rates. Most patients experience recurrent attacks, which converts depression into a chronic disease. Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a type of emotional dysfunction caused by genetic abnormalities or great changes in the patient’s environment, which can manifest as a host of symptoms such as persistent and spontaneous depression with changes in cognitive function. According to worldwide statistics, 50% of suicides each year occur during episodes of depression, and patients with MDD are 20 times more likely to commit suicide than the general population. During MDD, patients display obvious changes, such as inattention and memory loss, which are mainly manifested as deficiencies in executive function, memory, learning, language processing, and attention. Persistent symptoms seriously affect patients’ social communication, family life, study, and work, as well as the prognosis of patients and the recovery of social function. However, the mechanisms underlying cognitive dysfunction remain unclear. Therefore, the etiological understanding and treatment of MDD are urgent problems to be solved, in which understanding cognitive  dysfunction is an important goal for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with MDD. This review mainly expounds on the etiological and pathological changes and the treatment of cognitive function in major depressive disorder.

Etiology of major depressive disorder

MDD is characterized by one or more severe depressive episodes with significant changes in emotional, cognitive, and autonomic functions; significant weight loss or gain; fatigue; feeling worthless or guilty; inability to concentrate; and/or recurrent suicidal thoughts lasting for at least two [Error! Reference source not found.,1]. The incidence of MDD in women is twice as high as that in men, with one in six adults suffering from the disease. The pathogenesis of MDD has not been fully elucidated because it involves the interaction between complex genetic and environmental factors; hence, its etiological mechanism has been the focus of much research.

The main causes of MDD are as follows (Figure.1)

1)Personality traits: The negative components of personality, such as inferiority, remorse, and pessimism, can easily manifest in MDD; however, the risk of MDD can be reduced through daily psychological adjustment.

Once such a patient is diagnosed with MDD, the treatment time is prolonged, and most patients need pharmacological treatment combined with psychotherapy to completely eliminate the symptoms [1,4].

2)Genetic factors: MDD has obvious hereditary features. If someone in the family suffers from MDD, especially immediate family members, the likelihood of a person developing MDD will increase. Children whose parents have MDD have a 35–37% chance of developing depression. In addition, a genetic crossover between MDD and other mental disorders (such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder) has been identified [1,5,6].

3)Disease factors: Studies have shown that MDD is closely associated with diabetes, heart disease, cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, and stroke. If underlying conditions are present, the incidence of MDD increases. For example, about one in five patients with cardiovascular disease have MDD, and MDD is a risk factor for the incidence, severity, and poor prognosis of cardiovascular disease [7,8,9,10].

4)Environmental factors and adverse stimuli: When environmental stress is too high or patients experience adverse stimulation, the incidence of MDD increases [11,12]. MDD-related stress events usually occur one year before the onset of the disease, including unemployment, economic stress, chronic or life- threatening health problems, violence, separation, and bereavement, which often occur in adulthood [13,14]. However, Dannehl et al. found that children who experienced physical and sexual abuse, psychological injury, domestic violence, or premature separation from their parents were more likely to develop MDD later in life. The number and severity of adverse life events were positively correlated with the risk, severity, and chronic duration of MDD [14,15]. In most cases, the etiology of MDD is not singular, and different causes may exist simultaneously, augmenting each other’s effect on MDD occurrence and development. MDD will, in turn, affect its etiology. For example, patients with MDD are generally less able to withstand stress and are more likely to suffer from certain diseases than healthy people, and MDD also impedes the treatment of other diseases, such as depression associated with Alzheimer’s disease [16,17].

Cognitive Dysfunction and pathological changes in MDD

Figure 1: Pathogenesis of major depressive disorder

Studies have shown that patients with depression have defects in the following cognitive areas: executive function and attention transfer, memory, visual-spatial processing, and psychomotor function [18,19,20]. At present, cognitive dysfunction in depression is a primary focus of MDD research and is a potential predictor of occupational and social adaptation disorders in adult MDD patients. After the psychological symptoms of MDD are relieved, cognitive dysfunction persists and needs to be treated separately from emotional symptoms [21,22,23]. It is worth noting that patients’ cognitive deficits may affect their professional and social communication abilities and lead to suicidal ideation. Additionally, the persistence of cognitive dysfunction may interact with existing depression and increase the risk of recurrence [24,25].

The brain is a complex neural network with interconnections between brain regions. Studies have found that some neural network functions change during depression, including those of the prefrontal cortex and cingulate gyrus, subcortical areas of the striatum and thalamus, and temporal cortex, including the amygdala and hippocampus [26]. Lesions in the prefrontal cortex will cause a decrease in executive function, and a decrease in hippocampal volume will lead to memory impairment, which may be the progressive result of MD

[25,26]. Therefore, restoring the function of these structures may become the basis for the treatment of depression. However, existing treatment methods are not effective for all cases, and it is necessary to further understand the relationship between cognitive dysfunction and neural markers of MDD. Therefore, research and treatment of cognitive dysfunction in MDD are very important.

Initially, depression was thought to be only a mental disorder; however, with an increase in research on depression, a number of studies have found that patients with MDD have organic lesions. The cross-sectional results of brain structural imaging showed that the main brain regions related to MDD pathogenesis were the frontal cortex, thalamus, striatum, hippocampus, and parietal cortex [27]. Magnetic resonance imaging studies found that the volume of many brain regions decreased during MDD; in particular, hippocampal volume reduction was consistently observed, but it is not clear whether hippocampal volume reduction is an early manifestation or a late phenomenon in the course of the disease [28]. The hippocampus is involved in the memory, recall, and reward systems. There is evidence that when patients with MDD are stressed, the level of glucocorticoids in the hippocampus increases through the hypothalamus- pituitary-adrenal axis; glucocorticoids then bind to the glucocorticoid receptor in the hippocampus, resulting in hippocampal neuronal atrophy [29]. A study of antidepressant therapy and electroconvulsive therapy in patients with MDD showed that the decrease in hippocampal gray matter volume and hippocampal functional activity in patients with depression led to a decrease in negative emotion and cognitive ability, suggesting that the increase in hippocampal gray matter volume during therapy was related to the improvement of clinical symptoms[30,31,32,33].

The striatum is an important component of the basal ganglia. Neuroimaging studies have reported significant changes in the striatum of patients with MDD and decreased gray matter intensity in the ventral striatum of patients with MDD who committed suicide Major depressive disorder (MDD) causes great decrements in

health and quality of life with increments in healthcare costs, but the causes and pathogenesis of depression remain largely unknown, which greatly prevent its early detection and effective treatment. With the advancement of neuroimaging approaches, numerous functional and structural alterations in the brain have been detected in MDD and more recently attempts have been made to apply these findings to clinical practice. In this review, we provide an updated summary of the progress in the translational application of psycho-radiological findings in MDD with a specified focus on potential clinical usage. The foreseeable clinical applications for different MRI modalities were introduced according to their role in disorder classification, subtyping, and prediction. While evidence of cerebral structural and functional changes associated with MDD classification and subtyping was heterogeneous and/or sparse, the ACC and hippocampus have been consistently suggested to be important biomarkers in predicting treatment selection and treatment response. These findings underlined the potential utility of brain biomarkers for clinical practice. The interruption of striatal output is speculated to lead to impulsive suicidal behavior. Functional magnetic resonance imaging showed a decrease in striatal activity in the reward system, and the decrease in reward network connections was related to the severity of depression. These findings suggest that abnormal striatal activity plays an important role in the disease progression [34,35]. The literature shows that compared with healthy adults, the volume of the bilateral putamen, caudate nucleus, right amygdala, and left thalamus in MDD patients is significantly reduced [36,37,38,39]. The putamen plays a key role in emotion, cognitive processes, motivation, and motor regulation, whereas the dysfunction of the caudate nucleus may lead to the interruption of dopaminergic signals and reduce the afferent impulses of ventral tegmental dopaminergic neurons [39,40,41].

The pathological changes in different brain regions of patients with MDD may correspond to the symptoms; however, these alterations are difficult to use as the basis for treatment. At present, research on the role of each

brain region in MDD is incomplete, and it is difficult to treat one brain region alone.

Treatment of MDD

AMany hypotheses have been proposed for the treatment of MDD, including the stress-induced inflammatory factors hypothesis, hypothalamus pituitary- adrenocortical axis hypertrophy hypothesis, and metabolic abnormality.induced changes in neurotransmitters and neurotrophic factors hypothesis, among others. Changes that can lead to an increase in inflammatory factorsin the neural system are an imbalancebetween the synthesisand release of neurotransmitters, a decrease in the secretion of brain- derived nerve growth factor (BDNF), a decrease in theprotective effect on nerve cells, and the loss of cortical and hippocampal neurons. These circumstances lead to a declinein hippocampal functionand cognitive dysfunction. However, the detailed mechanism has not been fully clarified, and the corresponding treatment has not been developed. Currently, the main treatmentmethods for cognitivefunction are drug therapy, physiotherapy, psychotherapy, and exercisetherapy (Figure.2)

 

Figure 2: The main treatment of major depressive disorder

Pharmacotherapy for MDD

Many MDD patientshave improved moods after antidepressant treatment, but the improvement in cognitive function is not necessarily consistent. It hasbeen proven that persistent cognitive dysfunction after the remission of depressive symptoms is the reason why patients cannot fully recover, and vice versa; dysfunctioncan also lead to the persistence of cognitive symptomsin MDD. To date, two antidepressants, vortioxetine, andduloxetine,have been shown to cause direct, independent, and clinically related changes in cognitive dysfunction in patients with MDD [42,43]. Vortioxetine seems to have the greatest effecton psychomotor speed,executive control, and cognitive control,whereas duloxetine has the greatesteffect on delayedrecall [23,44,45]. Among the antidepressants, vortioxetine is the most widely studied [44.45,46]. It is an effectiveand well- tolerated antidepressant that inhibits serotonin (5-HT or 5-hydroxytryptamine) transporters and regulates a variety of 5-HT receptors [48,49]. Antidepressants administed throughmultiple pathways affect multiple neurotransmitter systems, including serotonin, norepinephrine, dopamine, gamm aminobutyric acid, glutamic acid, histamine, and the cholinergic system [50,51,52]. Previousclinical studies have shown that vortioxetine is an antagonist of 5-HT1D, 5-HT3, and 5- HT7 receptors and an inhibitor of some, but not all, 5- HT1A and 5-HT1B receptor agonistsand 5-HT transporters [1]. The inhibition of the serotonin transporter 5-HTT and the activation of 5-HT1A receptors induces a rapid and powerful antidepressant response, and the action of 5-HT3 receptors can increase the release ofnorepinephrine and acetylcholine in the forebrain and improve cognitive dysfunction in MDD [53]. Vortioxetine can increase extracellular 5-HT levels and induce adult hippocampal neurogenesis, which is a candidate mechanism for mediating antidepressant responses in rodents [54]. Acute administration of vortioxetine can reverse the memory impairment caused by a 5-HT loss in rats in a dose-dependent mner,and long-term treatmentcan reverse the memory impairment caused by a 5-HT loss in rats. Recent studieshave shown that acute and subchronic intermittent administration of vortioxetine can improve the reversal of learning disorder induced by 4-chloro-DL phenylalanine methyl ester hydrochloride, used to reduceserotonin in rats [545556]. In addition, the long-term use of vortioxetine can revert the reversal oflearning impairment caused by chronic intermittent cold stress in normal animals. Therefore, based on the available data, vortioxetine is a useful treatment option for patients with MDD and significant cognitive dysfunction.Physical Therapy for MDD

Physiotherapy for MDD mainly includes electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). ECT is an effective and safe treatment with proven success in the treatment of MDD [57]. However, the exact underlying mechanism remains unclear. Its antidepressant effect on changing the level of neurotransmitters, improving neuroplasticity, and increasing functional connectivity is related to BDNF levels [58]. ECT is usually recommended as a second- line treatment for depression because of its potential side effects such as transient memory impairment, disturbance of consciousness, headache, and nausea [59,60]. rTMS was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2008 for the treatment of major depression. It has been increasingly used clinically worldwide [61]. Experiments have shown that cranial magnetic stimulation can change the excitability of the stimulated areas of the brain, which lasts longer than the stimulation itself. From a therapeutic perspective, this feature of rTMS is particularly beneficial. Depending on the frequency of stimulation, the activity of the cortex becomes excitatory or inhibitory. When repetitive pulses stimulate the primary motor cortex, low-frequency stimulation (1 Hz) usually causes neuronal inhibition, whereas high-frequency stimulation (10–20 Hz) induces neuronal excitability [62,63]. The main target of rTMS in the treatment of mental disorders is the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Studies have shown that stimulation of the DLPFC by rTMS is a safe and effective alternative treatment for intractable depression [64,65]. The basic principle of MDD targeting the DLPFC is based on functional neuroimaging studies that show reduced activity in the left prefrontal lobe. The DLPFC is also an important node in the dorsal executive system, which is involved in cognitive control in emotion regulation. Cognitive control functions include selective attention, inhibitory control, and cognitive re-evaluation. The role of the DLPFC in regulating these functions has been supported by previous research [65,66]. Although rTMS has made many achievements in the treatment of cognitive function in MDD, the efficacy in many patients is different because of the heterogeneity of MDD. Many aspects of current research are unraveling the mechanism of rTMS itself; however, rTMS is still very promising for the treatment of MDD.

Psychotherapy for MDD 

The recurrence rate of MDD is very high; with each repeated attack, the depression situation worsens, and the risk of the next recurrence increases [67,68,69]. One study found that the risk of recurrence after one episode of major depression was 50% and 80

Conclusion

Although tremendous progress has been made in predicting, diagnosing, and ameliorating the symptoms of MDD, it remains a serious disease that imposes a heavy burden on both individuals and society [102]. In the treatment of MDD, the widely accepted outcome is symptomatic remission; that is, patients return to pre-ictal functional levels with no or only mild depressive symptoms. Combination therapy is currently advocated for MDD treatment [103]. Studies have found that, after antidepressants are administered in the acute phase of MDD, psychotherapy seems to be an effective strategy, and the effect is ideal in preventing relapse [68104]. There are still many unresolved problems associated with the combined treatment of MDD. For example, there are different treatment methods recommended for use in the acute exacerbation and remission periods of MDD; there is controversy as to which should be used as the main treatment, which should be adjuvant treatment, and when adjuvant treatment should be carried out [105]. However, these problems are significant. Therefore, an in-depth understanding of MDD is very important, and there is a long way to go before MDD can be successfully treated.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Science and Technology Department of Henan Province (Project No. 192102310084 and 222102310143) and the Youth Fund of Basic Medical School, Zhengzhou University (Project No: JCYXY2017-YQ-07).

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan