Advertisement

An Updated Practice Parameter for The Immunology of The Allergy Epidemic and The Hygiene Hypothesis

Mini-Review | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2835-8376/015

An Updated Practice Parameter for The Immunology of The Allergy Epidemic and The Hygiene Hypothesis

  • Alireza Heidari 1234

1 Faculty of Chemistry, California South University, 14731 Comet St. Irvine, CA 92604, USA

2 BioSpectroscopy Core Research Laboratory (BCRL), California South University, 14731 Comet St. Irvine, CA 92604, USA 

3 Cancer Research Institute (CRI), California South University, 14731 Comet St. Irvine, CA 92604, USA

4 American International Standards Institute (AISI), Irvine, CA 3800, USA

*Corresponding Author: Alireza Heidari, American International Standards Institute (AISI), Irvine, CA 3800, USA.

Citation: Alireza Heidari, (2023) An Updated Practice Parameter for The Immunology of The Allergy Epidemic and The Hygiene Hypothesis, Clinical Research and Reviews,2(1); DOI: 10.31579/2835-8376/015

Copyright: © 2023, Alireza Heidari, this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 27 January 2023 | Accepted: 03 February 2023 | Published: 13 February 2023

Keywords:

Abstract

Despite the fact that survey reports are not unusual, fewer than 10% of clinical journals offer clear guidelines to investigators for survey research. on this special article, we offer steerage on minimal pointers in the form of a checklist for (strong, horrific body response) and Immunology Reporting of Survey research (CHAIRS). Key elements/portions to think about consist of offering background records, such as a clear statement of the research educated wager and question, and motives (for doing something) for the study. whilst (thinking about/whilst one thinks approximately) pattern choice, a clean understanding of the connection among the target population, sampling frame, pattern scheme, representativeness, and sample length is needed. evaluation of the survey tool with the aid of content material professionals and test/evaluation of threats to survey (something is without a doubt what it claims to be) ought to manifest early in list of questions development with (critical notion/something to consider/admire) of questioning-related interviews and pretesting to assist (very near the fact or genuine number) dimension. remaining, a clear/open and sincere description of information series and (having to do with figuring out the pleasant of things without measuring them with numbers) and (having to do with measuring things with numbers) (capabilities/ features/ tendencies) of response charge is wanted to ensure that appropriate guesses (based totally on what you've been advised) and ends/cease consequences can be drawn from the survey studies [1-114].

Acknowledgement:

This study was supported by the Cancer Research Institute (CRI) Project of Scientific Instrument and Equipment Development, the National Natural Science Foundation of the United Sates, the International Joint BioSpectroscopy Core Research Laboratory (BCRL) Program supported by the California South University (CSU), and the Key project supported by the American International Standards Institute (AISI), Irvine, California, USA.

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan