Advertisement

Assessment of the Alterations of Semen Parameters after Varicocelectomy among Varicocele Patients in Tripoli, Libya

Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2835-7957/139

Assessment of the Alterations of Semen Parameters after Varicocelectomy among Varicocele Patients in Tripoli, Libya

  • Wade Alwan M Yahya 1*
  • Rabia A M Yahya 2
  • Karema El. M. Shkal 2
  • Azab Elsayed Azab 3

1Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Sabratha University, Libya

2Pharmacology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Sabratha University, Libya

3Physiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Sabratha University, Libya

*Corresponding Author: Wade Alwan M Yahya, Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Sabratha University, Libya.

Citation: Wade Alwan M Yahya, Rabia A M Yahya, Karema El. M. Shkal, Azab E. Azab, (2025), Assessment of the Alterations of Semen Parameters after Varicocelectomy among Varicocele Patients in Tripoli, Libya, Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, 4(6); DOI:10.31579/2835-7957/139

Copyright: © 2025, Wade Alwan M Yahya. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 13 October 2025 | Accepted: 29 October 2025 | Published: 07 November 2025

Keywords: men with varicoceles, varicocelectomy, semen parameters, tripoli, western libya

Abstract

Background: Varicocele is the most common cause of male infertility worldwide and varicocele repair is the world’s most commonly performed male infertility procedure. The presence of a varicocele has been associated with impaired testicular function, often causing abnormalities in semen parameters, including sperm count, motility and morphology, testis size and histology, blood hormone levels and pregnancy rates. The sub inguinal approach of varicocelectomy is one of the common procedures for treating varicocele. 

Objectives: The current study aimed to assess the effect of varicocelectomy on the semen parameters after varicocelectomy among men with varicoceles in Tripoli, western Libya. 

Methodology: This study included 50 varicocele patients with ages ranging between 23-47 years old. All patients underwent sub inguinal varicocelectomy with testicular artery preservation and were followed up after 3 and 6 months. In all cases at least two semen analyses were obtained pre-varicocelectomy, 3-, and 6-month post-varicocelectomy. All specimens were collected in a clean, wide-mouthed container. The specimens were collected in the laboratory by masturbation after a period of abstinence of 2-3 days. 

Results:  The results showed that there was significant improvement of the patient’s semen density postoperative after 3 and 6months P-value <0.005. The improvement in sperm concentration, and motility was 58.3%, 54.3%, 52.1% in each of them respectively. correlation between. There is no statistically significant difference was detected between the preoperative semen motility in the normal and subnormal testicular volume P-value >0.05. There was significant improvement of the patient’s semen motility postoperative after 3- and 6-months P-value <0.005. 

Conclusion: In conclusion and according to our results, the results showed that an improvement in semen parameters after 3 & 6 months of varicocelectomy. However, further well-designed studies may be needed to consolidate our result.

1.Introduction

Infertility is considered one of the main public health issues, as it affects about 15% of the couples of reproductive ages [1]. The male factor is involved in 40% - 50% of infertility cases [2]. The common cause of male infertility is varicocele, which in a European study was found to affect 16.6% of 7.802 men referred for infertility [3]. A possible reason for linking varicocele with infertility is the fact that it appears 2–3 times more frequently in men that attend infertility clinics, than in men of the general population or of proven fertility [3-6Varicocele is recognized as clinical problem, since it is very old in the history, and its association with male infertility is well-established [7, 8]. Over centuries, varicocele was important exclusion criterion for military service [9]. The importance of varicocele lies in its common presentation in the general public and infertility clinics, with an overall prevalence rate of 35-40% in men with primary infertility, and 80% in men with secondary infertility [10]. The etiology of varicocele probably multifactorial [11] and its pathophysiology shows us that can decrease fertility by different mechanism sit [12]. The sub inguinal approach of varicocelectomy is one of the common procedures for treating varicocele. It was described by several authors to simple, safe, and a favorable method for ligation of varicocele [13]. The effectiveness of varicocelectomy is still debatable; some of these authors studied the effect of varicocelectomy on semen parameters and reported marked improvement [14]. However, it was not unlit 1952 that, the possible association between varicocele and human sub fertility was formally recognized such recognition was derived from a single case report, of a men diagnosed with maturation arrest by testis biopsy, in which bilateral varicocelectomy resulted in improved sperm count and pregnancy by coitus [15]. Currently, varicocele is the most common cause of male infertility worldwide and varicocele repair is the world’s most commonly performed male infertility procedure [16]. Several studies have shown a significant correlation between varicocele and poor sperm quality. Some show a correlation with all parameters, and others to variety of different parameters only [17].

2. Objectives

The current study aimed to assess the effect of varicocelectomy on the semen parameters after varicocelectomy among men with varicoceles in Tripoli, western Libya.

3. Subjects and Methods

3.1.  Patient selection:

50   varicocele  patients   were included in the present study, which was carried out within the period from June 2024 to February 2024. All patients were recruited from the urology outpatient clinic, a special clinics in Tripoli, Libya.

3.2 Inclusion Criteria:

Patients aged (23-47) years, complaining of primary infertility with abnormal semen analysis scheduled for varicocelectomy.

3.3. Exclusion Criteria:

Cases with secondary varicocele and Azoospermia patients were excluded.

3.4. Semen analysis

In all cases at least two semen analyses were obtained pre-varicocelectomy, 3, and 6 month post-varicocelectomy. All specimens must be collected in a clean, wide-mouthed container. The specimens were collected in the laboratory by masturbation after a period of abstinence of 2-3 days.         

Postoperative semen parameters after 3, 6 months were compared to preoperative data. Perioperative changes in semen parameters were compared to preoperative ultrasound findings.

3.6.  Statistical Analyses:

Statistical analysis was done by ANOVA- test using SPSS program V.26. The data were expressed as mean ± SD. The P-value less than 0.05 was significant. 

4. Results

4.1. Preoperative patient data

This study included 50 patients with a history of infertility for at least 1 year. Patient age ranged from 23 to 47 years, with a mean age of 38.5 + 8.60 years. The duration of infertility ranged from 12 to 24 months with mean 20.21 months (Table 1).

Variables

Mean + SD

Age (years)

38.5+ 8.60

Duration of infertility in months

20.21+ 4.63

Table 1: Preoperative patient data

4.2 Preoperative and postoperative degree of improvement in patient’s semen density of normal and subnormal testicular volume

Table (2) and figures (1& 2) shows correlation between pre and postoperative semen density after 3,6 months in normal and subnormal testicular volume. There was significant improvement of the patient’s semen density postoperative after 3 and 6 months P-value <0>

Parameter

Preoperative  

Mean + SD 

After 3 months Mean + SD

After 6 months Mean + SD

F. test

P. value

Semen Density of Normal testicular volume 

6.98 + 0.52

9.85 + 0.95**

12.84 + 1.24**##

15.652

0.001

Semen Density Subnormal testicular volume 

6.83 + 0.24

7.14 + 0.76 *

8.97 + 1.13**##

8.352

0.001

Table 2: Preoperative and postoperative degree of improvement in patient’s semen density of normal and subnormal testicular volume

Figure 1: Preoperative and postoperative degree of improvement in patient’s semen density of normal testicular volume

Figure 2: Preoperative and postoperative degree of improvement in patient’s semen density of subnormal testicular volume

4.3. Preoperative semen motility.

Table (3) and figure (3) show correlation between the preoperative semen motility in the normal and subnormal testicular volume. There is no statistically significant difference was detected between two groups P-value >0.05

Parameter

Normal testicular volume 

Mean + SD 

Subnormal testicular volume Mean + SD

F. test

P. value

Preoperative Semen Motility (%)

16.5 + 4.53

15 + 4.25

1.420

0.158

Table 3: Preoperative semen motility.

Figure 3: Preoperative semen motility (%).

4.5. Preoperative and postoperative degree of improvement in patient’s semen motility in Normal and subnormal testicular volume

Table (4) and figures (4 & 5) shows correlation between pre and postoperative semen motility after 3 & 6 months in normal and subnormal testicular volume. There was significant improvement of the patient’s semen motility postoperative after 3 and 6 months P-value <0>

Parameter

Preoperative  

Mean + SD 

After 3 months Mean + SD

After 6 months Mean + SD

F. test

P. value

Semen Motility of Normal testicular volume (%)

16.5 + 4.53

26.75 + 5.86**

33.64 + 8.83**##

8.364

0.001

Semen Motility of Subnormal testicular volume (%)

15 + 4.25

19.50 + 4.95**

26.82 + 7.27**##

7.526

0.001

Table 4: Preoperative and postoperative degree of improvement in patient’s semen motility in Normal and subnormal testicular volume

Figure 4: Preoperative and postoperative degree of improvement in patient’s semen motility in Normal testicular volume

Figure 5: Preoperative and postoperative degree of improvement in patient’s semen motility in subnormal testicular volume

5. Discussion

Varicocele is elongation, dilatation and tortousity of the pampiniform venous plexus and the internal spermatic vein. It is detected in approximately 15–20% of the general male population, with the prevalence increasing to 40% of men with primary infertility, and 80% of men with secondary infertility [18]. The presence of a varicocele has been associated with impaired testicular function, often causing abnormalities in semen parameters, including sperm count, motility and morphology, testis size and histology, blood hormone levels and pregnancy rates [19]. Varicocele is the most common correctable cause in men with infertility. Although, varicocele is also detected in the general population, it is more common in infertile men and treatment can be of benefit for some infertile couples [20]. From   June 2024  to February 2025, 50 infertile men with abnormal semen analysis and varicocele were included in the study. Patients with secondary varicocele, 1ry testicular failure and azoospermia were excluded from this study. Also, semen analysis was done preoperative and for follow up after 3 & 6 months. We used improvement index to assess the outcome of varicocelectomy. Improvement index (<0>P< 0>). These results are in agreement with those of Merharban et al. [21].  who found 40.7% and 57.5% improvement index in sperm count and motility, respectively in normal and subnormal testicular volume. Testicular biopsy in males with varicocele shows a wide array of abnormalities. The most common finding are leydig cells hyperplasia, decreased number of the spermatogonia per tubule, spermatogenesis arrest and sloughing of germinal epithelium [22]. A thickened basement membrane of somniferous tubules and proliferative lesions of endothelium are often demonstrated and may affect transportation of oxygen and glucose through these structures [23]. The improvement index was significantly higher in patients with normal testicular volume than in patients with subnormal testicular volume (P< 0>)  [24]. Similarly, Pierik et al. [25] found that the increase in sperm count was related positively to testicular volume before surgery.

6. Conclusion

In conclusion and according to our results, the results showed that an improvement in semen parameters after 3 & 6 months of varicocelectomy. However, further well-designed studies may be needed to consolidate our result.

References

Clinical Trials and Clinical Research: I am delighted to provide a testimonial for the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and the exceptional quality of the journal for my article entitled “Effect of Traditional Moxibustion in Assisting the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients.” The peer review process for my article was rigorous and thorough, ensuring that only high-quality research is published in the journal. The reviewers provided valuable feedback and constructive criticism that greatly improved the clarity and scientific rigor of my study. Their expertise and attention to detail helped me refine my research methodology and strengthen the overall impact of my findings. I would also like to express my gratitude for the exceptional support I received from the editorial office throughout the publication process. The editorial team was prompt, professional, and highly responsive to all my queries and concerns. Their guidance and assistance were instrumental in navigating the submission and revision process, making it a seamless and efficient experience. Furthermore, I am impressed by the outstanding quality of the journal itself. The journal’s commitment to publishing cutting-edge research in the field of stroke rehabilitation is evident in the diverse range of articles it features. The journal consistently upholds rigorous scientific standards, ensuring that only the most impactful and innovative studies are published. This commitment to excellence has undoubtedly contributed to the journal’s reputation as a leading platform for stroke rehabilitation research. In conclusion, I am extremely satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the overall quality of the journal for my article. I wholeheartedly recommend this journal to researchers and clinicians interested in stroke rehabilitation and related fields. The journal’s dedication to scientific rigor, coupled with the exceptional support provided by the editorial office, makes it an invaluable platform for disseminating research and advancing the field.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Clinical Reviews and Case Reports, The comment form the peer-review were satisfactory. I will cements on the quality of the journal when I receive my hardback copy

img

Hameed khan